• Listening to the Now: Eight Artists Reframing Asian Contemporary Art in 2025

    Listening to the Now: Eight Artists Reframing Asian Contemporary Art in 2025

    In the slow unfolding of 2025, the contemporary art landscape revealed itself through a constellation of practices that pushed, pulled, and reimagined the boundaries of form, material, and lived experience. Within the evolving ecology of Asian contemporary art, this year unfolded as a site of negotiation between inherited histories and speculative futures, between localized knowledge and global circulation. Rather than a singular movement, 2025 revealed an attentiveness to multiplicity, where artists moved fluidly across geographies while remaining deeply tethered to place, lineage, and lived context.

    Below are eight artists who have shaped the trajectory of contemporary Asian art in 2025. Working across sculpture, painting, ceramics, sound, and hybrid modes, each bringing a distinct language to bear on the relevant issues that weighed on us all this year. What binds them is not a singular aesthetic but a shared insistence on art as a space of reflection, rupture, and renewal.

    GWON Osang, Reclining Figure-Watch, 2022-2023, Archival pigment print, mixed media, 192 x 52 x 88 cm, ⓒ GWON Osang. Courtesy of the Artist and Arario Gallery

    GWON Osang

    Seoul-based sculptor GWON Osang continues a decades-long inquiry into what sculpture might become when unshackled from its own traditions. Across his ongoing series, Deodorant Type, The Sculpture, New Structure, and Relief, Osang dissolves the weightiness of classical materiality, replacing it with photographic skin and aluminum frameworks that gesture toward both surface and depth. Within the lineage of postwar Korean sculpture, marked by both material rigor and conceptual restraint, Osang’s practice stands apart for its insistence on hybridity and illusion. In 2025, his work appeared in group exhibitions at institutions like Arko Art Center in Seoul, a year-long collaborative project with Roy Gallery’s new venue PS ROY in Seoul, and was featured at Art Busan with ARARIO Gallery, which has been central to his international representation. Osang’s practice persists in its quiet destabilization of expectations, inviting viewers to feel the present age through the “margin” of sculpture itself.

    Kawita Vatanajyankur, The Machine Ghost in the Human Shell, 4K Video and Holographic installation, 2024

    Kawita Vatanajyankur

    Media and performance artist Kawita Vatanajyankur expanded her practice this year into immersive projects that probe the systemic forces shaping labor and the body. Rooted in global capitalism’s unseen mechanisms, the Bangkok-based artist’s ongoing series, such as Performing Textiles and Field Work, alongside new 2025 works like Flight and Echoes, give form to the often invisible lives entangled in production, exploitation, and ecological collapse. Her work resonates strongly within Southeast Asia’s artistic landscape, where questions of labor, gender, and extractive economies are deeply embedded in everyday life. Vatanajyankur’s projects traveled widely in 2025, engaging public consciousness through collaborations with technologists, activists, and researchers. These conversations inspired curators to include her work in exhibitions across Asia and beyond, including Believe in a River at Guangdong’s Hengqin Cultural and Art Center and Protest is a Creative Act at the Museum of Australian Photography. These developments signal a growing institutional recognition of performance-based practices emerging from the region, culminating in preparations for her upcoming solo exhibition at Shanghai’s Yuz Museum in 2026.

    Quan Lim, Stony Sleep, 2025, Oil on canvas, 121.9 x 152.4 cm, Courtesy of the artist and Cuturi Gallery, Singapore

    Quan Lim

    In Singapore, painter Quan Lim emerged in 2025 with The Flood, a major solo exhibition of a new body of work at Cuturi Gallery in Singapore that deepened his interrogation of identity, myth, and narrative fragmentation. Using layered, gestural surfaces and figurative fragments drawn from art history, mythology, and everyday life, Lim’s work inhabits moments of rupture where memory and history collide, where storytelling becomes a way of understanding the self and others. Operating within Singapore’s tightly calibrated cultural ecosystem, Lim’s practice opens space for ambiguity, emotion, and dissent. His paintings this year, dense with allegory and dissonance, reflect a practice attuned to the instability of existence, conveyed through richly textured canvases that resist easy resolution.

    Sun Yitian, Storm, 2025, Acrylic on canvas, 205.4 x 158.4 cm, Courtesy the artist and Esther Schipper, Berlin/Paris/Seoul, Photo © Andrea Rossetti

    Sun Yitian

    Sun Yitian is a Beijing-based painter who continued her ascent this year. Her highly detailed depictions of quotidian objects turn toward ever more expansive explorations of desire, commodity, and cultural imagination. Known for hyper-real surfaces that oscillate between seduction and unease, Yitian’s works engage the deep structures of consumer society while reflecting personal history and collective nostalgia. Her 2025 exhibitions, including The Life of Things at Museum Voorlinden in The Hague, As She Descends with Qinhuangdao’s Aranya Art Center, and a solo show Romantic Room at Esther Schipper Gallery’s Berlin space, underscore how artists from China continue to navigate global visibility while retaining a sharp critique of spectacle and excess. This year reinforced her international profile and demonstrated her remarkable ability to render “thingness” itself into a language of the psychological with new, personally resonating depths for the artist.

    Dae Uk Kim, NORI totem, 2023, Synthetic hair, color rope, Dimensions variable, © Hyundai Motor Company

    Dae Uk Kim

    Based in Eindhoven, sculptor and storyteller Dae Uk Kim’s practice is a testament to the power of form to articulate the diverse narratives of identity and body politics. Kim weaves personal history with broader ecological and social registers, transforming materials like synthetic hair, ropes, and hybrid forms into embodiments of lived multiplicity. As a Korean artist working across Europe and Asia, Kim’s work reflects a diasporic condition increasingly visible in contemporary Asian art. In 2025, his practice broadened through collaborations with artists and brands alongside public dialogues that animate sculpture as an exchange between body, memory, and environment. His work had been exhibited in shows including Can the Monster Speak? with Delft’s RADIUS CCA, Check In, the Forgotten Guest at Gallery Remicon in Jeju, South Korea, The Tail by Maison the Fuax hosted by Framer Framed in Amsterdam, Fragments of Form at DOEN in Rotterdam, The Body Project presented in Munich, and a solo show with OSISUN in Seoul titled Grandma’s Cabinet. Kim’s work resonates as both introspective and outward-facing, with larger steps towards collective dialogues this year and anticipatory projects that extend beyond the field of sculpture into immersive, interdisciplinary presentations in the future.

    Lisa Chang Lee, World Atlas No.7, 2024, A series of 10 collages combining analog photographs, textiles, pencil drawing, vintage notebook, mapping pins, cutouts from World Atlas, and Post-it stickers, 55 × 70 cm each

    Lisa Chang Lee

    Working between London and Beijing, Lisa Chang Lee’s interdisciplinary practice this year spanned across sound, ecology, language, and technology. Through field research, installation, and AI-informed processes, her work examines listening as a political and poetic act, attuning audiences to the subtle interdependencies that shape environments and histories. Positioned within broader conversations around environmental degradation and knowledge systems in East Asia, her practice foregrounds care, slowness, and relationality. A founder of the ongoing research platform South of the Sea, Chang Lee’s projects in 2025 spanned institutional exhibitions and ecological storytelling frameworks that emphasize indigenous knowledge and collective listening. A selection of her recent projects was on view this year at the He Xiangning Museum of Art, followed by the Guangzhou Image Triennial and, in 2027, at the Beijing Art, Science, and Technology Biennale. Her work continually foregrounds the entanglement of place, memory, and perception, leveraging her research and interdisciplinary collaborations to ask us to consider how art might become a medium of care.

    Takuma Uematsu, SCULPTOR’S SNACK, 2025, Tin can, corn kernels , 11.3 x 7.6 x 7.6 cm, Open editon © Takuma Uematsu, Courtesy of Yumiko Chiba Associates

    Takuma Uematsu

    Building upon the Fluxus-inspired playfulness and philosophical curiosity that have guided him for decades, Osaka-based artist Takuma Uematsu embraced his move to embody energy and coincidence in his practice this year. Through sculpture, installation, and relational works, Uematsu explores boundaries between object, viewer, and environment, privileging encounter over completion. His practice occupies a unique position within Japanese contemporary art, where humor and conceptual rigor coexist as modes of quiet resistance. His 2025 project, The Sculptor’s Snack, considered the dynamics of everyday materials and communal experience, inviting laughter, reflection, and dialogue, and was presented as part of the WE THE DAY exhibition at the OAG Art Center Kobe.

    Yin-chen Li, View from the bottom No. 12, 2024, Ceramic with copper, tin, acrylic frame, 39.2 x 31.2 x 4.6 cm, Photo credit: Tu Yue-shiuan

    Yin-chen Li

    In Taipei, Yin-chen Li’s ceramics practice this year advanced an intimate inquiry into perception, psyche, and material responsiveness. Blending gestural mark-making with the unpredictable nature of clay and firing processes, Li’s work captures fracture, displacement, and fusion as metaphors for relational dynamics between viewer and form, interior and exterior, control and chance. Within the context of contemporary Taiwanese ceramics, her practice bridges craft lineage and conceptual abstraction. Each piece operates as both trace and threshold, inviting viewers into an active encounter with material embodiment. Her work was presented as part of the Piecing Landscapes: Experience in Layers at Gallery Unfold in Kyoto, featured in the Art Osaka 2025 contemporary art fair, in a solo exhibition titled Next Art Tainan: Hidden Sea at SOKA Arts, and was the Tainan New Arts Award winner.

    Across these eight practices, 2025 witnessed art that was simultaneously rigorous and tender. Their work held contradictions without dissolving them, which honored both form and fugitive experience. Seen together, these artists offer a snapshot of contemporary Asian art as a field defined not by uniformity, but by complexity, one shaped by migration, memory, and material consciousness. Whether through the layered narratives of paint, the corporeal provocations of performance and video, the sculptural interchanges of material and identity, or the resonant listening evoked by sound and ecology, this year in contemporary art affirmed a generative possibility: that art’s deepest work remains its capacity to hold us in reflection, and in reflection, to invite transformation.

    Review by Shannon Permenter

    Shannon Permenter is a freelance writer and art historian based in Arizona. After completing her Masters in History & Theory of Contemporary Art from the San Francisco Art Institute she has channeled her passion for the arts into a career helping artists, curators, and nonprofits share their work with the world.


    Interviews with Asian Art Contemporary


  • Interview | Hong Kong and London-based Artist Yvonne Feng

    Interview | Hong Kong and London-based Artist Yvonne Feng

    Yvonne Feng (b.1989) lives and works between Hong Kong and London. She completed her MA at the Royal College of Art in 2014 and her practice-led PhD, Tracing the Unspeakable: Painting as Embodied Seeing, at the Slade School of Fine Art, UCL, in 2020. She is an Associate Lecturer at Camberwell College of Arts, UAL, and formerly Senior Lecturer in Fine Art Painting at the University of Brighton.

    In her painting practice, Feng takes possession of life and societal events, infusing them with her own imaginary and subjective experiences. Through playful experimentation with figural forms and painterly gestures, she searches for representations that defy singular narratives and predefined meanings of events, making visible the intricate human condition within the midst of these occurrences.

    Feng received the William Coldstream Memorial Prize (2017) from the UCL Art Museum and the Excellence in Drawing Award (2015) from The Arts Club. She has exhibited internationally, including at Goethe-Gallery, Hong Kong; HART Haus, Hong Kong; The Supper Club with HART Haus, Hong Kong; Rabbet Gallery, London; The Salon by NADA & The Community with Current Plans, Paris; The Koppel Project, London; Daniel Benjamin Gallery, London; A.P.T Gallery, London; and the Freud Museum, London, among others. Her work is held in the UCL Art Museum Collection and various private collections worldwide.

    Impulse, 2025, Acrylic and oil on canvas, 160 x 200 cm, Courtesy of the artist

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I was born in Guangdong, China and moved to Kent, UK in my teens. Growing up, I didn’t see “artist” as a real profession, since there were no museums or art scene in my hometown, but I always found myself drawn to the school art room. It became a place where I could breathe, a refuge from the rigid, academically focused curriculum of Chinese schooling, and a space where I could create and express myself.

    Following that instinct, I went on to study Fine Art at the Slade School of Fine Art, UCL. During my undergraduate years in London, I immersed myself in museums and galleries, seeing art in person for the first time and learning art history and contemporary practice
    from tutors, visiting artists and peers. I absorbed everything like a sponge, trying to discover my own voice as an artist.

    During my Master’s studies at the Royal College of Art, the sudden incarceration of a family member became a turning point. I felt an urgent need to process, question and find my agency through drawing, painting and writing. That experience solidified my commitment to art making as a way of thinking through life events and as a form of self- empowerment.

    Index of Lost Words, 2024, Acrylic and oil on canvas, 50 x 60 cm, Courtesy of the artist

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    My recent work explores the notion of ‘Docile Bodies’ in a trilogy of exhibitions that approaches the theme through barrier, gesture and sight. Through a synthesis of bodily symbolism, pandemic-inflected motifs and fluid painterly gestures, I probe embodied memory and the ongoing negotiation between control and agency. I set up the canvas as a stage, incorporating symbolic boundaries and confined spaces that become a backdrop for contemplating how bodies conform to or resist predetermined rules, structures and restrictions. In doing so, I explore the intricate entanglement between the body and the spaces it inhabits.

    The imaginary figure or the recurring motif of the hand, bare or gloved, serving as a performative agent, for negotiating the inextricable relationships between the individual and the external crisis, the inner self and the collective, navigating the thresholds between
    self‐indulgence and restraint, autonomy and authority, performing a delicate choreography of mutual regulation. By situating the body in familiar yet dislocated environments, or by embodying existentially entrapped situations, I question whether the body is controlled or autonomous, disciplined or free.

    Exhibition view of Möbius Loop (2025), Courtesy of the artist and HART Haus

    How has your artistic style evolved over time?

    The style of my work has evolved in response to my ongoing search for communicative and representational strategies, especially as the themes I explore shift over time. I am constantly looking for new ways to represent past events that have become overly familiar through mediated images, sometimes so familiar that we stop questioning them or feeling anything toward them. I seek forms and gestures that can evoke shifting, ambiguous meanings and hold multiple layers of reference. As a result, one series may focus more on bodily gestures, while another leans into symbolism.

    What remains consistent is the presence of drawn and bodily elements. My process always begins with drawing, drawing receptively. The body is not only a recurring motif but also a medium I paint with. Through it, I allow its imaginary contours to open up, and I experience, in a corporeal way, the pains, pleasures and struggles of both myself and others.

    Mobius Loop, 2023, Oil on canvas, 180 x 100 cm, Courtesy of the artist

    In what ways do you think the art world has changed since you started your career?

    The art world has become more inclusive and globally interconnected since I began my career. When I was an undergraduate student, I encountered very few Asian tutors, and it was rare to see exhibitions by Asian women artists in London. I am glad to see that the landscape has diversified, and I feel honoured to have worked as a lecturer myself, witnessing students from many cultural backgrounds having their work exhibited and recognised.

    In the summer of 2024, I began working between Hong Kong and London. I have been struck by how vibrant the Hong Kong art scene is, from international galleries to grassroots project spaces. I once believed I needed to be in major art centres like London to build a career as an artist. London still offers a great deal, but places like Hong Kong are thriving too. Being there has opened up new conversations with audiences and allowed me to reconnect with my heritage in meaningful ways.

    Automation, 2022, Oil on canvas, 150 x 150 cm, Courtesy of the artist

    What challenges have you faced as an artist, and how have you overcome them?

    It often takes a long time to turn ideas into artworks and then have the opportunity to exhibit them. I remind myself to trust my intuition and to have faith in myself and the work.

    How do you stay inspired and motivated to create new work?
    I stay inspired by seeing exhibitions that intrigue me and by staying attentive to what is happening socially and politically around me. I question what I see, what remains unspoken or is forced into forgetting, and I seek out shared feelings and memories.

    Text & photo courtesy of Yvonne Feng

    Website: https://www.yvonne-yiwen-feng.com/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/yvonne.ywfeng/


  • Interview | Beijing and Shanghai-based Artist Dongbay (Yübo Xü)

    Interview | Beijing and Shanghai-based Artist Dongbay (Yübo Xü)

    Dongbay (Yübo Xü) is an artist and eco-warrior based between Beijing and Shanghai. Born in the Northeast of China and shaped by a nomadic upbringing, his practice explores humanity’s fading connection to nature amid accelerating industrial and digital transformation. Through installations, films, and writing, he combines organic materials with urban detritus, developing concepts such as primitive futurism and ritual minimalism to examine how ecological wisdom can be reimagined in the Anthropocene.

    髡锁 Quene Locks, 2023, Recycled animal materials and mixed media, 250 x 200 x100 cm

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I was born in an industrial town in Northeast China, a place where wetlands, oil rigs, and machinery existed in the same breath. My family moved frequently, shaping my relationship with land as something fluid rather than fixed. This nomadic rhythm became the foundation of my artistic practice.

    My path into art did not begin with theory; it began with daily life. I grew up observing the streets, the people, and the shifting landscapes around me, and I started creating simply out of an instinct to respond to what I saw. Graffiti, drawing, and small interventions in public space were my earliest forms of expression, long before I had the language to describe why I was making them.

    Over time, these intuitive practices became a doorway into deeper questions. The environments I moved through, industrial relics, expanding cities, and later, remote regions during fieldwork, made me aware of how quickly our connection to land and non-human life was disappearing. What began as a personal habit of looking gradually evolved into a more serious inquiry into ecology, belief, and the emotional cost of modernization.

    Today, my installations, films, and field-based projects continue to grow out of this mixture of lived experience, street-level observation, and long-term research into how humans navigate the Anthropocene.

    髡锁 Quene Locks, 2023, Recycled animal materials and mixed media, 250 x 200 x100 cm

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    My work revolves around two guiding concepts: primitive futurism and ritual minimalism.

    Primitive futurism imagines a world where ancient intuition and modern systems coexist, where mythology and technology are not opposites but parallel forms of ecological memory. Ritual minimalism strips away excess narrative to restore a sense of spiritual density in contemporary art.

    More broadly, I examine themes of ecological rupture, industrial debris, spiritual displacement, material reincarnation, and the fading ability of humans to perceive the non-human world. My installations become a space where the synthetic and the organic collide, forcing us to rethink coexistence in an era of crisis.

    Synth Totem, 2024, Recycled animal materials and mixed media, 280 x 250 x 80 cm

    How do your personal experiences and identity influence your art?

    My identity is shaped by migration, industrial landscapes, and long-term fieldwork in different ecological communities. Growing up in rapidly changing oil towns taught me that land is alive, which is volatile, resilient, and wounded.

    This background makes me sensitive to environments where the connection between land and life is disappearing. I spend extended periods living in remote or peripheral regions, learning from people whose ecological wisdom still survives modernization. These lived experiences, not documentation, become the emotional and structural logic of my work.

    Rather than positioning myself above the material, I approach creation as a collaboration with land, memory, and the overlooked. The “eco-warrior” aspect of my identity is not a statement but a responsibility I carry into the work.

    Synth Totem, 2024, Recycled skateboard trucks and mixed media, 280 x 120 x 6 cm

    Are there any specific materials you prefer working with in your installation work? Why?

    I often work with recycled industrial waste, like steel cables, electrical wires, skateboard trucks, and recycled organic remnants such as animal hides, bones, and human hair.

    These materials are embedded with stories of exploitation, abandonment, and resilience. Industrial debris carries the imprint of overproduction; animal hides salvaged from poaching reflect ecological violence; human hair connects the work back to the body.

    By weaving these fragments together, I create hybrid structures, part creature, part relic, that embody both decay and rebirth. Using what has been discarded allows the work to become a form of alchemy, transforming residues of destruction into carriers of new meaning.

    Goddess Who Sells Time, 2025, Recycled animal skins and mixed media, 350 x 200 x 180 cm

    Can you describe a recent project or artwork that you are particularly proud of?

    A recent project I am developing is Goddess Who Sells Time, an installation shaped by my field research in India, especially in environments where caste, labor, and belief intersect. The work draws from the symbolism of Chhinnamasta, reinterpreting her cycle of creation, preservation, and destruction as a contemporary logic of self-exposure and resistance.

    The installation uses local bamboo scaffolding, recycled animal hides, industrial debris, and regional calendar pages, materials deeply tied to everyday survival in lower-caste communities. The Trinity Puzzle section incorporates blue Dalit-associated text fragments arranged in scrambled sequences, requiring viewers to “spend time” reconstructing meaning. This reading process becomes a quiet act of confronting the social cycles that structure caste hierarchies.

    Rather than representing a single encounter, the work reflects the broader political and spiritual tensions I observed on-site. It is both a ritual structure and a social commentary, exploring how marginalized groups sustain belief, dignity, and resistance within systems that attempt to contain them.

    Goddess Who Sells Time, 2025, Recycled animal skins and mixed media, 350 x 200 x 180 cm

    What do you hope people take away from your art when they experience it?

    I hope my work slows people down, just enough for them to sense the nearly imperceptible rhythms that still exist beneath the noise of modern life.

    I am not offering solutions or nostalgia. Instead, I create openings where viewers can feel the tension between decay and vitality, between the synthetic and the natural, between technology and myth.

    If people walk away with a renewed awareness, an understanding that coexistence requires reciprocity rather than control, then the work has done its job. Ultimately, I want my works to reactivate a form of ecological perception that our era is rapidly losing.

    Text & photo courtesy of Dongbay (Yübo Xü)

    Website: https://totemdongbay.com/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/totemdongbay/


  • Interview | Hong Kong-based Artist Xie Chengxuan

    Interview | Hong Kong-based Artist Xie Chengxuan

    Xie Chengxuan, born in Guangzhou in 1997, graduated from the Department of Fine Arts at the Chinese University of Hong Kong in 2020 and completed an MA in Painting at the Royal College of Art, London, in 2023. 

    He works primarily in acrylic and mixed media on canvases and papers. His  practice is grounded in deconstruction: objects are reduced to their  elementary visual units—points, lines, planes, colour blocks, textures— then reassembled. Because each viewer’s cultural and personal lexicon differs, the resulting images resist a single reading. The independent  elements continue to interact in the finished work, keeping the surface in  unresolved dialogue. 

    The act of painting is digestion. Influences—political, social, intimate—are  taken in, broken apart, and reconstituted through repeated returns to the canvas. Each layer records a shift in thought; closure is refused. Prettiness  is avoided; the visible struggle is the point. 

    Works by Xie Chengxuan are held by the Ashmolean Museum (Oxford),  Shanghai Outbound Museum, X Museum (Beijing), and private collections.

    Jump Ship, 2025, Acrylic charcoal on canvas, 100 x 80 cm

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    Two kindergartens, three primary schools, two secondary schools. Guangzhou, Auckland, Hong Kong. Art degree at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. A year in South Carolina. Painting master’s at the Royal College of Art.

    My mother was pregnant with my brother when the one-child rule said no. We left for Auckland with four suitcases, one way. In school there, older kids read to younger ones after lunch. My reader liked pop-up books—dinosaurs jumped, houses opened. I waited for that moment every day. When it was my turn to read, I gave the same book to a white boy. He looked at me and said to his friend, “It’s a Chinese.” I didn’t know the word then, couldn’t even write it. Later they sent us back to Guangzhou to learn.

    Now I see I never belonged anywhere—and that is good. Flags do not touch me.

    At university, Hong Kong burned. The biggest revolt ever. We shouted in the streets—Chinese or Hong Konger—but my New Zealand self fit neither side. I wanted truth, found only noise. In the end, I kept one thing: I am human. That is all.

    Why paint? Every move killed friendships before they began. There was no one to talk to, so paint talked for me. Loneliness makes artists. It made me.

    Moving taught me to drop ideas fast. Better ones came, I took them. My first real start was a summer in Chongqing: sketching with teachers, copying masters, drawing the model, learning to look.

    Copying is not copying—it is living inside another man’s hand. To know Picasso, I must stand where he stood. Many fear influence and guard a small self. But the self is only what it steals; I steal from the best.

    Why keep painting? Because things stolen must be digested. Painting digests. You watch me digest—that is the picture.

    The Rush, 2023, Mix media on synthetic paper, 62 x 78 cm

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    Human nature. The phrase sounds empty, but I am sick of the post-Duchamp game of sticking clever labels on pictures. No human being is that simple, yet the world shoves us into tick-box lives. War news always comes in two slants; the only fact is that the slant shapes us.

    Our job is to chew the slant and see what remains. That chewing is where human nature shows.

    I wrestle on the canvas, and the scars of that wrestle become the picture. I look into war, then women’s rights, then children—more and more—but all are only carriers. I give no final verdict; I show the argument as the painting progresses. To paint war with planes and blood would be false—and an insult to the dead. The “human nature” I show is only mine.

    Zen has taught me to be here, now. Walking meditation drops the destination; the walk itself is the point. In art, this means that the act of making must matter more than the finished thing. The process is the reflection on life.

    Subjects? Private moments, public scandals, war, petty daily satire. Art must not float above life. Tied to life, it cannot repeat itself—human nature has too many faces.

    Tinned Kiss: make the expiry date little longer, 2024, Mix media on canvas, 180 x 170 cm

    How has your artistic style evolved over time?

    From the start, I distrusted the factory routine: sketch, fill, texture, finish. A nude model, two minutes of line—that is the picture. Later tracing and colouring only prettify and kill the sense.

    Modernism forced every canvas to answer: not what you paint, but why you paint so, and what the act means. I was once asked, “Why is painting called painting?” The word keeps the gerund even as a noun. The picture is still arguing with itself.

    Line, plane, and colour do not cooperate—they talk. The canvas stays unresolved because it mirrors the argument in the room. We move from A to B to C; the subject may shift—no matter. You do not remember every day of your life, yet every day has made you. A stroke now answers everything that ever touched me. Months later, a new thought arrives; I repaint, and the picture turns.

    This endless argument is closer to how people actually are—full of doubt, revision, and contradiction.

    Bruce Lee broke something open for me. Early on, I sketched outdoors, then turned sketches into studio pieces—a ladder aiming at an imagined end. But combat is give and take; a planned routine is not art. I tried to smash the ladder: workshops, rubbings from stone and bark, answering outdoor textures indoors. Soon I saw that this caught only the skin of things.

    Lee said a punch is the whole space answering back—even the bird on the branch. Later, answers came from culture, family, history. Studying Derrida’s deconstruction welded all these answers into what I do now.

    Childrenland III, 2024-2025, Mix media on canvas, 230 x 140 cm

    Can you describe a recent project or artwork that you are particularly proud of?

    Every canvas gets everything I have. Larger ones take longer, grow denser, but I am not proud of any.

    Take Childrenland III as an example. It looks at what birth-planning did to women. “Did to” already turns them into objects; the shame goes on.

    On the left side: women in a birthing machine. One head is a transferred image of Guanyin, the female Bodhisattva. Below, the date of the one-child rule—when second pregnancies were dragged to abortion. On the right: red characters quote the Chairman, now urging three children. My mother said it was too raw and asked me to destroy it. I painted crosses instead, letting some words bleed through—another mark of the argument.

    The same local offices that once hauled women to abort now knock on doors begging for babies. On the top left are two men’s heads; on the right, a giant hand toasting them with a glass. At the centre stands a woman stepped out of the machine, glaring at us. Beneath her are ghosts of earlier paintings—old arguments showing through.

    The five Childrenland canvases grew together, back and forth. They began with war, moved to a children’s hospital bombed in Ukraine, then to child welfare, and finally to women. One argument, still moving.

    After Party: Lan Kwai Fong, 2024, Mix media on canvas, 78 x 100 cm

    What role do you believe art plays in social and cultural change?

    I stopped believing art can change society long ago. It may sting a few consciences or open a new window for some, but capital runs the show and art cannot touch it. We use art to ask where we fit in this machine.

    Friends and I joke that artists are parasites. How many farmers, workers, and drivers must give their hours so one man who adds nothing to survival can smear paint—simply because he refuses to be a cog? The question is not what art changes, but why it is allowed a meaning bigger than bread.

    Remember Eden: Adam and Eve were told not to eat the fruit. The serpent came, the bite, the sin. With free will, they were bound to eat sooner or later. God knew, yet gave the gift. Free will matters more than happiness. Painting on is the search for that bigger meaning.

    Art may nudge culture a little, but only within the cage of politics and money. Tang poetry reached its peak when eighty percent of people were illiterate and poets were officials. Literacy had to wait until the Qing collapsed. Art history is the story of the few who had patrons. Their work echoed through centuries but barely brushed the lives of their own time. Art is not a lever for social engineering. Humanity is too tangled; art looks at the tangle, finding meaning or amusement.

    Pool: Vest Girl, 2024, Mix media on canvas, 90 x 70 cm

    How do you approach exhibiting your work? What are your goals when showing your art in public spaces?

    A good picture must strike the viewer—make them think, make them gasp, but always bring them back to what it is to be human. The best place is the studio: mess, coffee rings, the fight in plain sight. Studios are pigsties, canvases block the light—impractical, yet the rawest truth lives there. Still, a solo show comes closest.

    Many painters find a trick, repeat it, and call it style. One glance at an art fair and you know the hand: money, yes; surprise, no.

    My view is simple—stop making pretty pictures. In Chinese we say “zhuo”: clumsy, unpolished. Strip ornament, strip polish. Prettiness smells of fear of the buyer’s eye. Raw marks come closer to the plain self, therefore to plain humanity.

    Painters who freeze a manner turn factory. Drop the chase for beauty and the whole scaffolding of “style” wobbles. Ugliness is revolt; revolt is motion.

    In public, I want people to see how I meet the world—chew it, spit it back. I want them to watch me wrestle on one canvas until they see a man and think of themselves. If someone leaves my show and says, “That fellow is worth knowing,” I have done my job.

    Text & photo courtesy of Xie Chengxuan

    Website: https://www.xiechengxuan.com/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/artjx/



  • Interview | Seoul-Based Artist Moon Mean

    Interview | Seoul-Based Artist Moon Mean

    Moon Mean (b.1999) is a Seoul-based painter, whose works reconstruct large and small events that happen to him and his surroundings using materials of his own making. He prepares solid and light atypical blanks by layering macerated Hanji and paints on them with turbid pigments he calls metallic tempera. Like the moon hanging over a smudged horizon, the silhouette of the ceiling in his room at night with unknown time, the ripples in the river as someone else would have seen, scenes with no name or owner are slowly transformed by the artist’s hand into uneven images.

    For him, reality is an opaque mass of too many superimpositions to grasp clearly. Fragments of images stored in his phone or glimpsed on social media overlap and intermingle in a foggy field of faded light, transforming them into abstractions. Flowing on the edges of painting and sometimes borrowing from sculpture and installation, Moon’s work questions the gap between reality and fiction, truth and misunderstanding, seeing and being.

    Tomorrow no.6_Two steps back for one step forward, 2024, Black ink and metallic tempera on handmade paper, 178 x 90 x 20 cm, © Moon Mean

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    Honestly, I would say “by chance.” 

    Before I started my artistic career, I worked as a tattooist for about 5 years – this was the very first practice that led me to art. I entered university without much thought and was making works as class assignments. However, I gradually realized that what I was doing was more than just coursework. 

    I feel like I become genuinely myself when I’m working, and it is something that makes men feel alive more than anything else. Tattooing had also been one of the creative practices for me, but it had to involve “clients”, which became inherent constraints in my practice. Art-making, on the other hand, has been an affirmation to myself. It allowed me to work in a much freer and more self-directed way. 

    Though I’ve come this far by chance, looking back, the phrase “by chance” encapsulates the time I spent experiencing the difference between the two creative practices. Perhaps it was through that experience that I gained a clearer sense of direction and confidence in my path as an artist.

    Tomorrow no.5_So that my work does not become a meaningless struggle, 2024, Black ink and metallic tempera on handmade paper,178 x 90 x 15 cm, © Moon Mean

    Are there any particular mediums you prefer working with? Why?

    I’m drawn to the materiality and inherent logic of traditional mediums, such as painting and sculpture. These mediums, which rely on the involvement of the body, reveal the process of thinking through hand, and are therefore closely tied to the subjective experience of making—something I value deeply.

    My approach to these kind of mediums also connects with how people view the artwork. I prefer viewers to move freely through space and experience the work at their own pace, rather than following a fixed point of view, narrative, or a flow of plot. 

    In my current practice, I work primarily with painting, but often borrow the methods of sculpture and installation to create paintings with volume.
    Unlike conventional paintings, which presuppose a frontal point of view, my work allows observation from multiple, shifting perspectives—much like sculpture, where no single viewpoint dominates.

    For me, the practice of painting is not just about “painting”. It is a process through which thought unfolds and form takes shape. I move between the acts of painting and sculpting, allowing matter and image to exist on the same plane, coming together into a single, cohesive form. In this sense, I see myself not only as a painter but also as someone who treats images as one of those sculptural materials. This attitude toward the medium lies at the core of my work.

    Tomorrow no.8_(Im)Possible, I guess, 2025, Black ink and metallic tempera on handmade paper,138 x 210 x 30 cm, © Moon Mean

    How has your artistic style evolved over time?

    My first solo exhibition, Doesn’t matter though (2024), explored the tactile senses of skin using paper that I made by hand. The idea stemmed from my past experience within tattoo culture and my obsession with body images, and it was about a process of investigating the boundary between skin and surface.

    The series (2023–2024) on the show initially began with sculptural works that reassembled fragments of my own and others’ bodies. As I continued working, however, I was drawn to the inherent qualities of paper itself—its texture, relief, and absorbency—and began expanding its possibilities into a painterly context. In that sense, it was a chance for me to break free from self-imposed limitations, and at the same time was an opportunity to expand my artistic practice as a whole. 

    As I concluded the series following the exhibition, I found out that the wooden canvas I had made were warping during production. In addressing this issue, I naturally began questioning the very structure of the support—the frame of the painting itself—which led me to carve and construct the supports by hand.

    From there, my practice evolved toward what I now describe as the “standing shell.” These works explore ambiguous forms that exist as both painting and sculpture, both material and image—forms that stand upright on their own.

    Konckin’ On Heaven’s Door, 2024, Black ink and metallic tempera on handmade paper, 65 x 50 cm, © Moon Mean, Courtesy of the artist and ThisWeekendRoom, Seoul

    Can you describe a recent project or artwork that you are particularly proud of?

    I wouldn’t say it’s something I’m particularly proud of, but there is a series I’d like to introduce. It’s titled IMAGE HANDLING PRACTICE—as the name suggests, it’s a set of sketch-like studies that train my sensitivity in handling images.

    Looking back, form has played a significant role in my practice. At various turning points, formal concerns have shaped the work, and material exploration has often served as its foundation. For that reason, I’m always careful not to let my practice remain at the level of purely material or formal experimentation. 

    To prevent the Tomorrow series—which physically takes the form of a “shell”—from ending up as something that looks convincing yet hollow, I work on IMAGE HANDLING PRACTICE in parallel, as a way to refine my sense of image-making as a painter. This series serves as both a form of ongoing training and a process of self-correction, helping me to build toward stronger, more grounded works. Furthermore, the IMAGE HANDLING PRACTICE sketches are conceived as a flexible structure that can be re-incorporated into my main working system, serving as a material that oscillates between image and matter. 

    IMAGE HANDLING PRACTICE 11, 2025, Black ink and metallic tempera on handmade paper, 43 x 39 cm,© Moon Mean

    How do you stay inspired and motivated to create new work?

    I’m the kind of person who tends to have a lot on my mind, and perhaps because of that, I draw inspiration from a wide range of things. 

    Sometimes I find interesting points or a conceptual idea from a single sentence or a word, and at other times, inspiration comes from music—its melody, emotion, or lyrics. I also find new possibilities in small, fleeting moments of everyday life, and occasionally from scientific fields that seem far away from my work, such as relativity or string theory. At times, I start brainstorming from looking at certain social or cultural phenomena. 

    Although there are many different sources of inspiration, they ultimately end up on everyday life and human experience. Looking back, I think it all leads to a broader reflection on how I perceive and live within the world.

    More specifically within the realm of visual art, I construct what I call a motif pool—a collection of diverse visual information.

    It includes everything from scenes I’ve directly encountered to images imprinted on my retina through a screen. From there, I select, combine, deconstruct, and reconstruct visual materials as part of my process. I also reference works from other media—such as sculpture, photography, and video—adapting parts of their structure or sensibility into my own painterly language.

    Tomorrow no.10_To whom I’ll never know, 2025, Black ink and metallic tempera on handmade paper, 136 x 84 x 36 cm, © Moon Mean (2000px)

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the future?

    I’m currently continuing my long-term series titled Tomorrow.

    In this body of work, I carve the support by hand and create a thick paper that retains the traces of hand, embodying the passage of time and physical gestures within the material itself. On these surfaces, I paint using a material I call “metallic tempera”—a mixture of metal powder, gouache pigments, and animal glue. Through this process, I aim to let the traces and temporality of oxidation naturally permeate the surface.

    During the painting process, I layer images captured from different sources and moments. In the final stage, I remove the internal support, leaving only a hollow shell. This emptied shell detaches from the wall and stands on its own—what I call a “standing shell”—marking the moment when a painting becomes a self-supporting structure in space.

    As the metallic tempera merges with the surface of the handmade paper, the work acquires contradictory qualities: it may appear like an ancient relic, both solid and fragile, thick yet thin. I’m drawn to this paradoxical point where materiality and processual temporality become entangled. 

    Although these works take the form of paintings, they carry the gestures of sculpture. There is no fixed point of view. Depending on where one stands, the image shifts, twists, or becomes partially obscured. The viewer therefore get to choose what to see and from where to see it. Within this imperfect act of viewing, I question the act of seeing itself—what and how to see. The Tomorrow series is a process of exploring how a subject perceives the world, and how I, as that subject, stand within its uncertain boundaries. At the same time, it is an ongoing experiment on how painting can exist within space. Through the form of “a painting that rests on the floor on its own,” I hope to allow viewers to move freely through the space, encounter the works at their own pace, and discover new meanings within them.

    Text & photo courtesy of Moon Mean

    Website: https://www.m00nmean.com/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/moon__mean/


  • Interview | Seoul-Based Artist Yaerin Pyun

    Interview | Seoul-Based Artist Yaerin Pyun

    Yaerin Pyun is a ceramic artist working between Seoul and London. Her education at the Royal College of Art (UK, 2023) expanded the scope of her creative inquiry, building on earlier studies in ceramics during her BFA at Seoul National University of Science and Technology (South Korea, 2019).

    In recent years, Pyun has been recognized with several international distinctions, including the Monica Biserni Prize at the 63rd Premio Faenza (Italy, 2025); finalist at the 6th Triennial of Kogei (Japan, 2025); finalist at the inaugural Seoul Yoolizzy Craft Award (South Korea, 2024).

    In 2025, Pyun presented my solo exhibition Poem for Ephemeral Moments in Hong Kong. She also participated in major international exhibitions such as Design Miami (US), the 6th Triennial of Kogei at the 21st Century Museum of Contemporary Art (Japan); Salon Art & Design (US) PAD London (UK); Fine Art Asia (Hong Kong); Design Miami<Illuminated: A Spotlight on Korean Design> (South Korea); the 63rd Premio Faenza (Italy); Taipei Dangdai Art & Ideas (Taiwan); and Landscape of Materials at Cromwell Place (UK).

    Between 2020 and 2024, she also exhibited in multiple countries, including China, South Korea, and the United Kingdom.

    Pyun’s works have been internationally collected, including by the International Museum of Ceramics (Italy), Charles Burnand Gallery (UK), and various private collectors.

    Poem for Ephemeral Moments 250310, 2025, Ceramic, 30 x 17 x 34 cm, © SOLUNA FINE CRAFT

     Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I have been close to nature since childhood, and it has always been a fundamental source of interest and inspiration for me. My current practice began during the COVID-19 pandemic, when I often went to the mountains, looking for places away from people. The most memorable thing at the time was the moss growing on weathered stones. I used to think of tiny things like moss or flowers as fragile and fleeting, but in that space, I came to see their vitality, energy, and the beauty that exists only in that moment.

    Nature constantly changes, but instead of losing its meaning or value, it reminded me that the momentary existence itself is precious. I felt that this characteristic of nature resembles human life, and this realization became the starting point of my work.

    Poem for Ephemeral Moments 250621, 2025, Ceramics, 57 x 30 x 36 cm, © SOLUNA FINE CRAFT

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    I reinterpret familiar elements of nature through ceramics to make them unfamiliar. My work’s a process of questioning fixed perceptions and values attached to objects. I believe that by observing and contemplating even the most ordinary objects, one can connect with a universal sense of life. This perspective suggests that the essence of being lies not in appearance, but in the process through which emotions, memories, and thoughts accumulate and transform.

    In this sense, I regard ceramics as a medium that embodies the boundary between what disappears and what remains, through the unpredictable transformations and traces left in the firing process. I transform seemingly immutable, solid stone into a fragile form with a hollow. I also turn the fragility and transience symbolized by moss into something solid and enduring by coating it with slip and firing it.

    Through these transformations of materiality and symbolism, I explore the boundary where the value and meaning of objects shift and are reconfigured.

    Poem for Ephemeral Moments 250718, 2025, 57 x 30 x 36 cm, © SOLUNA FINE CRAFT

    What role do you believe art plays in social and cultural change?

    By translating the world into an artist’s visual language, I believe that art can challenge familiar perceptions and values, opening up new ways of thinking about society and culture.

    My work explores how materials from everyday life can be reinterpreted and given new meaning. When familiar materials or forms are transformed into something unfamiliar, they can be detached from their original context and become part of the viewer’s own experience.

    This shift in understanding can also extend to how we view society and culture. In this sense, art can serve as a starting point for social and cultural change by suggesting such possibilities for transformation.

    Poem for Ephemeral Moments 241213, 2024, Stoneware, porcelain, stains, rock components, glaze, 51 x 40 x 43 cm, © SOLUNA FINE CRAFT

    What challenges have you faced as an artist, and how have you overcome them?

    I think the real challenge for me is not about being an artist, but about how I manage the uncertainty I feel as a person. Because doubt and uncertainty are a natural part of my practice, I make an effort to engage with them in a constructive way. For example, I set regular hours for working each day and spend part of my time caring for various plants. These small daily routines, though seemingly trivial, play a crucial role in grounding and stabilizing me.

    Poem for Ephemeral Moments 2410121, 2024, Stoneware, porcelain, stains, rock components, glaze, 30 x 17 x 34 cm, © SOLUNA FINE CRAFT

    Do you collaborate with other artists or creators? If so, how has collaboration influenced your work?

    I haven’t collaborated with other artists or creators yet, but I’m always open to the possibility. I believe there is value in how different perspectives and approaches can come together to expand the scope of a practice.

    Poem for Ephemeral Moments 250803, 2025, Ceramics, 51 x 41 x 44 cm, © SOLUNA FINE CRAFT

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the future?

    The title of my current project is “Poem for Ephemeral Moments”. It suggests a form of memorial intended to quietly observe, sense, and hold the memory of things that disappear or change. I collect elements from nature and transform them into ceramics. Through this process, I hope to encourage viewers to move beyond familiar ways of thinking and see the world from their own perspectives.

    Based on ongoing research into ceramic materials, I’m exploring how my work can better interact with exhibition spaces. I aim to expand the work into spatial scenes that invite viewers to pause and reflect in personal contemplation.

    Text & photo courtesy of Yaerin Pyun

    Website: https://www.yaerin.net/
    Instagram: http://instagram.com/yaerin.art/


  • Interview | Singapore-Based Artist Lai Yu Tong

    Interview | Singapore-Based Artist Lai Yu Tong

    Lai Yu Tong is an artist from Singapore who works across drawing, image-making, sculpture and sound. His practice is interested in creating adequate media to articulate the present, believing in the intrinsic need for humans to make images and tell stories. Recent works of his consider how art can evoke empathy in a world so damaged.

    Lai has presented his work at group exhibitions in Singapore and abroad, most recently at Twin Gallery Laundry (US), Radio28 (MX), and Plague Space (RUS); and held solo exhibitions in Singapore at ShanghART Gallery (2025), Temporary Unit (2022), The Substation (2021), Comma Space (2020), and DECK (2019).

    Besides his art, Lai regularly publishes books under Thumb Books, a self-founded press that makes children’s books for both children and adults. His recent curatorial projects include Frida, an exhibition platform by his kitchen window; and Robin, a series of group exhibitions held in camping tents around Singapore.

    The Crows, 2024, 3.44 min video, CRT television, headphones, pine wood, 40 x 50 x 30 cm

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I was one of those kids who drew a lot. I didn’t talk much and spent a lot of time visiting parks and nature reserves in Singapore in my childhood. I went to art school and developed an interest in photography and media art which I guess is what I am formally trained in. After finishing school, serving in the army, then going back to art school for my degree, I stopped using cameras and computers much and moved on to sculpture and drawing.

    Three Ball Cascade (Mexico City), 2025, 7 min video with sound, video installation, pine wood, Dimensions variable

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    I see my job as an artist as being someone who makes images and media to describe this time and place that I live in, much like how people in the past made drawings of their lives on cave walls. I try to make images that are necessary or adequate today, about living and dying, about cities, about the animals and about the world.

    Newspaper Painting No. 111, 2021, Synthetic polymer paint on newspaper, 76 x 62 x 4 cm

    How has your artistic style evolved over time?

    I think for me it is constantly evolving and always kind of chaotic. I tend not to stick to mediums, styles and techniques for too long as I am interested in learning new ways to make art constantly and to create works that are made whilst I’m in the process of learning. I also try to surprise myself and the audience by going in directions that are unpredictable and challenging to me each time I start a new work. A big change for me in the past 10 years was to use computers, screens and technology less and to devote myself to a more analog, low-tech, studio-based practice.

    Children’s Chairs, 2022, Pine wood, emulsion paint, beeswax, Dimensions variable

    What challenges have you faced as an artist, and how have you overcome them?

    I live my life with a lot of fear. Possibly because of my upbringing, coupled with the fact that I lived my entire life in Singapore, a very controlled country teeming with anxiety and micro-aggressions. Recently, what I fear the most is that I will slowly lose my mind. I fear a lot that the very thing that I love, making these silly things in my studio, will unearth too much trauma and inner rage that it will eventually cause me to self-destruct. Besides this, I used to deal with a lot of self-doubt and a lack of confidence. I try to manage these fears everyday by focusing on love and being grateful for being alive and being loved by others.

    Juggling Balls (Red, Green, Yellow), 2025, Plaster gauze, toilet paper, chalk, graphite, pine wood, Dimensions variable

    How do you manage feedback or criticism, especially in the context of public exhibitions?

    I welcome criticism and feedback as it doesn’t affect me much anymore. I think I have realized that whether the audience likes it or not, these are the things that I make generally outside of my own control. In the sense that I have no choice but to make them exactly this way at this time. All my cards are on the table, so I know there is nothing much I can do. I also like to listen to what people tell me I should do, so that I can do the exact opposite. An artist I really like recently told me: don’t give the people what they want.

    Car Drawings, 2022-2023, Colour pencils on paper, framed 38cm x 31cm x 3cm each

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the future?

    I’m working on two new art books that I will publish under my press, Thumb Books. They are my works presented as unorthodox children’s books. I am also excited to be presenting a piece that I made for the Esplanade Tunnel in Singapore, and to work on a solo show at an art space in Seoul, YPC Space. I hope to be making more books alongside my practice so that I can bring them around the art book fairs around the world as I really like this format of sharing and distributing my works.

    Text & photo courtesy of Lai Yu Tong

    Website: https://laiyutong.com/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laiyutong_things/


  • Interview | Seoul and London-based Artist Sooin Huh

    Interview | Seoul and London-based Artist Sooin Huh

    Sooin Huh is an artist based in Seoul and London. She received her BA in Fine Art from Goldsmiths, University of London, and her MA in Sculpture from the Royal College of Art. She observes objects through their contexts, relationships, and the narratives accumulated within them. Each object exists where multiple layers of meaning such as social, cultural, and historical codes intersect. She focuses on how objects are rediscovered and interpreted through an archaeological lens, observing how they are continuously redefined and reinterpreted within relationships beyond a linear sense of time. Through this process, she aims to reveal how the classificatory and hierarchical systems we encounter in daily life are provisional and incomplete. In her work, the movements of objects that traverse the boundaries between center and periphery, visibility and invisibility reveal that they are entities negotiating and repositioning themselves within social networks of meaning. Through this process, she also reflects on her own mode of existence and articulates her position toward it.

    Her major exhibitions include the solo show Collected Connection (Keep in Touch, Seoul, KR, 2023) and group exhibitions Assemble/Fall (Somers Gallery, London, UK, 2025), Festus (Hangar Gallery, London, UK, 2024), and Flash of Light (Nonscaled, Seoul, KR, 2024). In 2025, she received the Gilbert Bayes Award from the Royal Society of Sculptors (UK) and the Chunman Art for Young Award presented by the Chunman Scholarship Foundation (KR).

    What I Saw While Wandering and Biting, 2025, Mixed media, variable dimensions

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I have always been drawn to the physical presence of the objects that surround me in everyday life. I became fascinated by how these objects interact with one another and shape the environment around us. This curiosity gradually developed into an exploration of how objects respond to each other’s movements and form particular relational states. Through this process, I realized that every relationship is shaped through a sense of negotiation and adjustment, which became the starting point of my practice. Living in Seoul and London, two cities that are complex and organically intertwined, I became aware that the relationships between objects extend beyond their material dimension and are deeply connected to social realities. Within this environment, my desire to understand the world naturally evolved into my artistic practice and the visual language I use today.

    Flowing Ground, Traced Remnants, 2025, Mixed media, variable dimensions

    Are there any particular mediums you prefer working with? Why?

    I mainly work with found objects, which include everyday items familiar in our surroundings as well as architectural materials and other elements that construct the spaces we inhabit. I choose found objects for their anonymous quality, which allows me to reconsider how existing systems of authority operate. I also use architectural components to stage the theatrical process through which spatial orders are reorganized. Within this process, I focus on the temporary states that emerge when an object’s past time and context enter the present and its relationships become entangled. This state appears at the point where an object attempts to be rewritten within new relationships while simultaneously being held in place by the realities it already belongs to. The two opposing forces interrupt each other, and in this moment of suspension, the object resides in a time where expansion and stillness coexist. In this suspended equilibrium, objects remain unmoving yet continue to function as active entities. Through actions such as overlapping, tilting, imitation, and adaptation, I explore the relational nature of these materials and experiment with how they transition within the systems that shape our world.

    Collected Connection, 2023, Sound based installation, mixed media, variable dimensions

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    Exploring the transformation of objects is a way of examining the structure of relationships and, ultimately, observing how different entities perceive and adjust to one another. This relational tension naturally leads to the question of difference and coexistence. What my work ultimately seeks to address is the form of coexistence in which different beings can continue to exist while transforming one another. Although each object carries a distinct origin, these differences are reconfigured within the context of relationships. Through this process of transformation, the objects renew each other, and the meaning of coexistence is continuously redefined. Through my work, I aim to expand the sculptural conditions of coexistence as fluid and open-ended, searching for new languages of relation.

    Collected Connection, 2023, Sound based installation, mixed media, variable dimensions

    How do your personal experiences and identity influence your art?

    My personal experiences and identity are closely connected to the sense of existing as an individual within institutional structures. These experiences shape my perspective on how I interpret the world. Objects function as both a language that mediates between myself and the world, and as devices that reflect the identity of the individual formed within systems. The personal or speculative narratives that emerge in my work develop into hypothetical propositions that momentarily twist or reconstruct the order of given environments. Through this process, I explore points of rupture and possibility where change can occur even within fixed structures.

    Beyond a transverse axis, 2024, Mixed media, variable dimensions

    Can you describe a recent project or artwork that you are particularly proud of?

    In my recent work What I Saw While Wandering and Biting, I constructed a private space of an imaginary figure using objects layered with different temporal and cultural histories. This space functions as a point where emotional memory and otherness intersect, and as a self-portrait realized without a physical body. Old still-life paintings and anonymous landscapes blur the boundaries of authorship, history, and cultural authority, revealing a process in which meanings shift and are translated into new contexts. Through this, the work critically examines how structures of identity and value are formed and transformed within relationships where the boundaries between self and others become entangled.

    Archaeology of Three Moons, 2020, Mixed media, variable dimensions

    What role do you believe art plays in social and cultural change?

    The change that art generates ultimately lies in questioning what is accepted as reality. Art makes the familiar unfamiliar, prompting us to pause and reconsider the orders and structures we take for granted. This unfamiliarity is not merely a visual disruption but a moment of reflection that reconfigures the systems of language and perception through which the world is understood. I believe that art’s contribution to social change does not reside in directly overturning institutions or norms. Rather, it operates within existing systems, revealing the gaps and residues that those systems fail to perceive, and from there, it experiments with new possibilities of relation. Through this process, art reconstructs the very structures that sustain social reality. I believe that art serves as a field of thought that gently unsettles reality, and that change begins within those subtle disturbances.

    Text & photo courtesy of Sooin Huh

    Website: https://www.sooinhuh.com/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sooin_huh/


  • Interview | Berlin and Bangkok-based Artist Montika Kham-on 

    Interview | Berlin and Bangkok-based Artist Montika Kham-on 

    Montika Kham-on is a video artist and filmmaker based in Berlin and Bangkok whose practice explores collective fear, speculative futures, and embodied resistance through moving image and performance. Her recent work, Afterlives (2025), imagines a post-tropical future and was commissioned by GHOST:2568. Beyond her video practice, she founded Phimailongweek, a site-specific art festival supporting emerging artists through experimental, context-responsive practices. Montika is currently pursuing an MA at the Berlin University of the Arts (UdK) with support from the DAAD scholarship.

    A Storm That Took Everything; The Eye the Storm, 2025, Single-channel video and light projection with stereo sound, 15 minutes, Photo by Natthaya Thaidecha

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I grew up in a small housing development inside an industrial area. It was a gated community, and as kids, we were never allowed to go beyond the gate because right across from us was a food processing factory. For me, this housing development always felt strange, unlike any other place. It was designed almost like a Russian doll:, one gate inside another, layer after layer, until you reached the innermost part. Sometimes I felt trapped from the inside.

    But of course, that never stopped a child from playing. I remember there were so many tropical trees and plants around that it almost felt like living in a resort, which was very different from what you saw once you stepped outside.

    I believe the way we play as children shapes who we become. As a kid, I loved imagining stories from my surroundings, creating creatures and places that didn’t exist. For example, I used to tell stories about red flowers that would turn into octopuses when they fell from the tree, floating up into the sky to find their freedom. One day, my father gave me his digital camera, and I made my first stop-motion film. That was how it all began.

    At first, I never thought about becoming a video artist or director. My dream was to work as a production designer for film, to build the worlds that others imagined. But my film school trained us to become directors, so I had to find my own way to understand light, colour, and the thresholds between inside and outside, the space between reality and imagination. I realised that a film didn’t have to be realistic; it could be emotionally true. For me, when you move beyond realism, into abstraction, emotion, and feelings that are hard to explain, that’s where you can feel most free.

    My final year in film school in Bangkok was hard. It was 2020, the year of COVID. Learning filmmaking through a computer screen was never easy. At the same time, Thailand was seeing one of its biggest youth protests, with young people standing up against the military government and asking for justice and fair elections. It was a radical and beautiful moment for the art scene, because art was one of the few spaces the government couldn’t fully control. Many of my friends skipped the class to record what was happening outside. I also skipped study, but I wasn’t very good at making documentaries. Instead, I began exploring experimental film and contemporary art to express my emotions and experiences during that time. Through experimental film and video, I could imagine other realities, worlds I wanted to live in. That was when I showed my first installation in a group exhibition in Bangkok.

    Afterlives, 2025, 4K, color, stereo, 20 minutes 48 seconds, Photo by Montika Kham-on

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    My work centers on the intersection of myth generational trauma and future imagination. We are all inhabitants of a dominant mythos and the essential question is who created it. I believe the only way to genuinely overcome the myth that controls our lives is to tell the story that authentically belongs to us. My understanding of myth is deeply informed by the Southeast Asian context which teaches a non-linear way of seeing the world and perceiving time. These narratives rarely follow the typical hero’s journey instead they often culminate in tragedy suggesting that sorrow itself is a vital lesson. This tradition guides the very way I approach telling a story.

    As an artist I possess the tools to articulate my experience and the story I couldn’t deny telling is about my own family’s intergenerational trauma. This legacy became tangible when I read my grandfather’s notebook detailing his childhood struggles, his moments of hope gained and lost. I was led to wonder if his unfulfilled dreams and the dreams of those before him now live within my own body. I recognize the profound sacrifice they made to ensure a better future for their descendants, understanding that my path too demands significant sacrifice. What I must do is keep their story alive effectively keeping their ghost alive through my art.

    This clear connection to the past directly fuels my exploration of future imagination. Because I see history so clearly I can project the picture forward. We are living amidst ideas of destruction and apocalypse yet my generation still holds out hope for a better future. The medium of the moving image is key to this; it literally projects light and plays a crucial role in shaping our collective imagination. I’m fascinated by the idea that when humans contemplate the past and the future they engage the same parts of the brain suggesting that the images we conjure for the future are fundamentally sourced from our own memory. This insight led me to the concept of Nimitr, a Sanskrit term signifying vision, dream or divine imagination. Nimitr represents that fluid space between consciousness and belief where images appear before they are materialized. It touches upon images you consciously create as well as those you simply do not control. The tension and potential of this uncontrollable image are central to my current interest connecting this way of thinking to how we can genuinely imagine our future.

    NANG, 2025, Mixed-media installation, sculpture, stainless steel, single-channel video, 1minutes, 135 cm x 70 cm, Photo by Olivier Therrien

    How do you stay inspired and motivated to create new work?

    Whenever I feel unmotivated or in need of inspiration, I turn to books. Reading, for me, is a process, a journey inward. Sometimes, when feeling lost in life or during the process of making art, reading becomes a kind of affirmation, like having someone to talk to. Over time, I’ve started building my own collection, both fiction and non-fiction, mostly by female and queer writers such as Arundhati Roy and bell hooks. Their words have become my guides.

    I’m also very project-oriented. Whenever I start a project, I ask myself whether it’s trying to answer “what” or “how.” Some projects don’t give me a clear “what,” but they teach me the “how.” For example, my collective and I founded Phimailongweek. For me, it wasn’t just about making a festival, it was about learning how to create a supportive ecosystem for emerging artists, where knowledge is shared peer-to-peer, cutting through art-world politics to prove that collaborative learning can work. It was a way of learning by doing, and that process itself became meaningful.

    I’ve also realized that I can’t stay motivated alone. Being around like-minded, spirited people keeps the energy alive. While filmmaking or art-making can be done solo, the work that moves me the most always comes from collaboration. When people come together to create something bigger than themselves, whether it’s a festival, a symposium, or a shared vision, that’s when real miracles happen.

    Rite of Shadows, 2024, Video projection on haze, color, stereo, 10 minutes 08 seconds, Photo by Pakapol Wannao

    Are there any particular mediums you prefer working with? Why?

    I have always been completely fascinated by moving images and how much the world fundamentally shifted after this medium was born. Now we are truly creatures of the moving image. We use our own eyes to sense and navigate the world more deeply than ever before. It makes me stop and wonder what was the dream of people before this technology was created.
    Whatever that dream was, it is the moving image that is actively shaping our reality right now.

    But of course at the same time this medium is a great tool for both manipulating reality and emotion. Everything we see in a moving image whether it is in cinema , on television in advertisements or even scrolling on our phone constantly shapes the way we perceive. This is what led me to become so interested in the mental image of our own ancient imagination. I mean
    that imagination is one of the earliest human abilities; it did not arrive recently with language or technology. While language dramatically improved how we think and communicate it’s clear that ‘thinking with imagery’ and even ‘thinking with the body’ were operating hundreds of thousands of years earlier. The profound power of the moving image even at its origin lies in its ability to tap directly into this deep primal skill. It is woven into our deep human history to read, store and retrieve emotionally coded representations of the world, a process driven by conditioned associations not by propositional coding or logic. This explains why the moving image speaks to a fundamental pre-linguistic part of us making it such a potent tool for both shaping and manipulating our reality.

    The moving image therefore serves as my primary tool to question the very reality we inhabit. I utilize it to project ideas into the senses offering a way to think beyond the frame itself. The core of my artistic exploration centers on a single question: can we actually find the true agency of the medium, the inherent capacity that allows it to set itself free from external manipulation.

    Siamese Futurism, 2021, HD, color, stereo, 8 minutes. Photo by Montika Kham-on

    What do you hope people take away from your art when they experience it?

    I hope my art can offer a space where people feel connected through shared but private human experiences, a space that allows for reflection, change, and a sense of freedom. I am interested in the possibilities of life, in how we move through pain, desire, and transcendence together.

    In Buddhism, especially in the Mahayana tradition, there is an idea of collective awakening, where change does not happen alone, but through shared attention or presence. That is what I hope my work can hold: a kind of group meditation, where people see parts of themselves in others.

    My art often comes from my own brokenness and generational trauma, but also from a wish to go beyond destructive cycles, to question what we inherit and how we might live differently. I hope that when people experience my work, they feel the possibility of deep personal change, even in the middle of chaos, a reminder that love, freedom, and renewal are still possible.

    Prephecy, 2025, Video on matte acrylics glass, stereo, colour, 3 minutes, 149.3 cm x 84 cm, Photo by Panisa Khueanphet

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the future?

    Right now, my main focus is on a long-term project called Post-Tropical Cinema. It’s something I’ve been developing for quite some time, and it continues to grow with me. At the moment, I’m writing and preparing to translate it into an exhibition that explores what I call post-tropical future aesthetics.

    This project looks at how moving images, performance and installation can imagine new realities emerging from tropical contexts, beyond exoticism or colonial fantasy. It’s about rethinking cinema not only as a medium but as a space of ritual, memory, and transformation.

    In the future, you can expect to see me continue expanding this framework, collaborating with other artists and researchers across Southeast Asia and Europe, and finding new ways to connect film, contemporary art, and collective imagination.

    Text & photo courtesy of Montika Kham-on

    Website: https://montikakhamon.com/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/montikakhamon/


  • Interview | Singapore-Based Artist Chok Si Xuan

    Interview | Singapore-Based Artist Chok Si Xuan

    Chok Si Xuan (b. 1998, Singapore) is driven by a deep fascination for the complex relations that enmesh technology in the everyday blurring the lines between the human, the organic, motors and machines. Exploring cybernetics, the feminine, and the ways in which technology and industrial materials shape contemporary subjectivities and corporealities, her growing body of work features composite sculptures and kinetic installations that coalesce odd circuitries, feedback systems, found electronics, and material components of common technological devices into uncanny symbioses between intimacy and automation.  In Singapore, her work has been shown in and commissioned by institutions such as ArtScience Museum, Singapore Art Museum and Esplanade, as well as independent art spaces. Outside of Singapore, she has exhibited at the Science Gallery Melbourne, Australia.

    Produced in-residence at NTU Centre of Contemporary Arts, exhibited as part of Techno-Diversions: Nothing has to be the way it is, as part of Singapore Art Week, 2025, Linear actuators, fiberglass rods, smartphone grippers, nylon, custom electronics and batteries, Dimensions variable, Image credits to artist

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I had always been interested in art from a young age, attending art classes,  visiting exhibitions at the local museum, though I never thought of becoming an artist, simply because I never knew it was a career path.

    After discovering the Fine Arts Programme as a Fashion major at the LASALLE College of the Arts Singapore, I quickly switched into Fine Arts when I saw my peers in that course creating the most exciting pieces. After completing my Diploma and Bachelor’s in Fine Arts in 2020, at the height of the COVID-19  pandemic, I took a leap of faith to start practicing art professionally.

    Across the five years, I have developed works across mediums of installation, sculptures and electronics. In conversations of themes such as cybernetics, specifically between humans, natural life and engineered systems, I am interested in how post-human cultures and material technologies shape how we understand ourselves. My materials range from found electronic appliances, everyday objects, to highly technical materials.

    Currently residing and practicing in Singapore, I have exhibited in various contexts: with institutions such as the Singapore Art Museum, Esplanade, Art Science Museum and Centre for Contemporary Art (Nanyang Technological University), Science Gallery(Melbourne) , to independent/non-profit spaces such as starch and Art Outreach.

    Produced in-residence at NTU Centre of Contemporary Arts, exhibited as part of Techno-Diversions: Nothing has to be the way it is, as part of Singapore Art Week, 2025, Linear actuators, fiberglass rods, smartphone grippers, nylon, custom electronics and batteries, Dimensions variable, Image credits to artist

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    I enjoy exploring a broad range of themes, but my works often return to a key few.

    The first being the idea of embodiment, what it means to experience the world through our biological body, how we are able to relate to one another, and what kinds of senses and emotion we engage in when we move through the world.

    Secondly, the sensations of uncanniness and alienation. With technologies such as messaging platforms and social media, we have the most access we have had to one another in all of history, and yet we often use these to disengage from our surroundings. An example of how alienation seems to be all around us, these systems bring about a sense of unfamiliarity in the familiar.

    Lastly, the importance of intimacy. While we might be disengaged with our surroundings, we build a sort of strange intimacy with technological devices, our phones, tablets, televisions. What does it say when the entities that know us best might be machines?

    I explore the implications of these themes throughout my works and hope that my works can ask such questions.

    Exhibited as part of New Eden, Art Science Museum Singapore (2023-2024), and SCI-FI, Science Gallery (2024-2025), 2023, Bioplastic, polyurethane tubing, steel, pneumatic systems, microcontrollers, Dimensions variable, Image credits to Science Gallery Melbourne

    How do you stay inspired and motivated to create new work?

    As cliché as it might sound, I believe that my practice is entangled with my everyday curiosities, so the motivation to create work comes from my own curiosity of the things that I come into contact with, the people that I talk to, or experiences that I have. It almost feels like second nature at times to think about conceiving an idea through experimentation and reading, which leads to new work when the time is right.

    Exhibited as part of New Eden, Art Science Museum Singapore (2023-2024), and SCI-FI, Science Gallery (2024-2025), 2023, Bioplastic, polyurethane tubing, steel, pneumatic systems, microcontrollers, Dimensions variable, Image credits to Science Gallery Melbourne

    Who or what are your biggest influences, both artistically and personally?

    I have been very inspired by works of theorists such as Byun-Chul Han (Non-Things, ShanZhai),Laura Tripaldi (Parallel Minds), Mark Fisher (The Weird and Eerie), as well as learning a lot from artists such as Berlinde De Bruyckere, Magdalenda Abakanowicz, David Altmejd, and local inspirations such as Weixin Quek Chong, Victoria Hertel and feelers.

    Personally, the spaces and people that I encounter in my life have been a huge source of inspiration: nature reserves, electronics stores and hardware shops to name a few. I also have the great fortune of being inspired by my peers and friends, who engage in a lot of dreaming and exploration with me (you guys know who you are!)

    Produced as part of an Artist-in-Residence Program at the Singapore Art Museum, 2022, Nylon fabric, dismantled body massagers, microcontroller, Dimensions variable, Image credits to artist

    What are your thoughts on the use of technology and digital platforms in the art world today?

    It is about time that we are attempting to engage with technology in a critical manner, questioning why and how we use them, and how it shapes our lives. Especially with the increased acceleration and adoption of such systems and infrastructures in all aspects of our lives, now more than ever are these discussions more pertinent. Art can be a crucial vehicle in creating opportunities for such dialogues to truly allow us to think for ourselves, and to understand that technologies are ultimately non-neutral gestures and spaces.

    Produced as part of SAM Contemporaries, a commissioning platform for emerging practices, and exhibited as part of ‘How to Dream Worlds’, 2025, Kinetic installation of Silicone, custom PCBs, linear actuators, servo motors, NiTiNOL, accompanied by a film in collaboration with Natalie Soh, Dimensions variable, Image credits to the artist

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the future?

    To mark 5 years of my practice, I am currently working towards an independent presentation. A deep dive into materiality of electronics, exploring the histories of pre-semiconductor, semiconductor and memory, this will take place at starch (Singapore) in April 2026 which I am very excited about.

    Text & photo courtesy of Chok Si Xuan

    Website: http://si-xuan.online/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sixuannn/