• Interview | New York-based Artist Hannah Bang

    Interview | New York-based Artist Hannah Bang

    Hannah Bang (b. South Korea) is an interdisciplinary artist based in New York City and South Korea. Her work spans various media, including video, painting, performance, and installation, focusing on exploring and presenting an understanding of human consciousness.

    Hannah has exhibited her work in a solo show at SCAD C-5 in Atlanta, at Cedar House Gallery in Savannah, and in group shows in New York.

    Recently, she served as the Scenic Designer for the opera production Così fan tutte at the Seoul Arts Center. She has also completed artist residencies at Dusty Co. in New York, Stove Works in Tennessee, and NES in Skagaströnd, Iceland. In addition to her art practice, Hannah is the founder of IN 3 SECONDS, a collection of art practices featuring contemporary living artists. She also curated a group exhibition at 72 Warren St, New York, in 2024.

    Who can prove this?, 2025, Photo credit to The Blanc and Li tang community

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    Do you believe in destiny? I am someone who lives within a giant wave that begins and ends with destiny. (Note: The “destiny” Hannah speaks of might be a word that only truly makes sense to her, but I am borrowing the concept for now.) Hello, I am Hannah—someone who was born and raised in South Korea, learned Korean first, lived in Savannah, Georgia, then Atlanta, and later New York City, floating around from place to place and loving the people I meet while experiencing various residencies. To answer for the readers of this interview: my journey in art began the moment I was born, and its foundation was built as I lived my life. It started as a matter of destiny. If you ask how I came to be, I was born in March 1998.

    Who can prove this?, 2025, Photo credit to The Blanc and Li tang community

    How do you stay inspired and motivated to create new work?

    I either take on new challenges or stick to a steady routine. Right now, I am working on scenic design for the first time. When the offer for this experience arrived, I was exactly at a point where I wanted to try something new, so I gladly accepted. Some days, I cry so much that I take a selfie at 3 AM just to leave proof, terrified I might die of dehydration (though the moment a camera appears, the crying tends to subside because it snaps me back to reality). On other days, while waiting at a red light, the breeze is so nice and the sunshine makes me so happy that I excitedly grab the steering wheel and dance in my car. I have to drink coffee every day, and I love sleeping in. I soothe myself by seeking out a familiar body lotion. Creating new work is novel, yet familiar. It is vaguely familiar. Depending on the direction of my inspiration and motivation, I can tell whether a piece is entirely new or a familiar evolution that becomes new work. Just as tying your shoelaces means you’ve actually put on your shoes, closure is important; however, I have been wearing laceless InstaPump Furies for ten years now. That shows how finishing a piece is deliberate and important, yet perhaps not the definitive answer to everything. Maintaining motivation feels like the hardest part, but if it is destiny, I believe I will constantly create and leave traces behind in some form as long as I live. Consistency is key. But no matter how much I create or conceptualize, what occupies my thoughts most these days is the space to show the work, the opportunity, the timing, and capturing that perfect moment!

    Who can prove this?, 2025, Photo credit to The Blanc and Li tang community

    Because your work spans several mediums, do you think of each project as beginning with a concept, an image, a gesture, or a material?

    In an instant, images, moving visuals, or ‘shouted’ sentences that I simply cannot ignore float into my mind. It becomes harder to dismiss them, and they grow increasingly specific. I then consume things to bring them into reality—my life, my time, conversations with colleagues, financial support, emotions, and my reality. Because of this exhaustive process, the output spans multiple mediums. In a way, I am in a position of taking orders… from myself!

    Your practice has been described as moving between documentation and experience. How do you think about that line in your work?

    Thank you for asking; that is a wonderful question! Hmm… Weight. Responsibility. Finding closure is always the most difficult part. As experiences accumulate, the residue they leave behind becomes documentation, and I think the boundary line is vividly revealed through my decisions as an ‘editor’—the intentional acts of purposefully writing things down and deliberately erasing them.

    Could you share your thoughts on being included in Time Lag?

    Time is a moment everyone experiences. I was deeply grateful that my work—my replication—could appear in a space I had never physically visited, especially while my actual body was so far away and frantically moving. All of this happened in a span of about ten days: finishing my residency at Stove Works in Chattanooga, Tennessee, packing up my life in New York, giving a visiting artist lecture in Hawaii, and heading back to South Korea. I want to express my special thanks to Webson Ji for connecting me to this opportunity.

    What do you hope people take away from your art when they experience it?

    I hope they experience the visible diversity of human existence and those mediated moments—the simple realization that ‘there are people like this, and people like that’! I also want to share a moment of breathing together with them. I truly look forward to the day we can face each other in person!

    Artist Profile: Photo by wm.johnsonphotography at Stove Works
    Who can prove this? (2025) Artworks: Photo credit to The Blanc and Li tang community

    Photo by wm.johnsonphotography at Stove Works

    Website: https://www.hannahbang.com/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hb4god/


  • Interview | Hong Kong and Seoul-based Artist Gyung Jin SHIN

    Interview | Hong Kong and Seoul-based Artist Gyung Jin SHIN

    Gyung Jin Shin (b. 1983, Seoul, Korea) is an artist and researcher based in Hong Kong and Seoul. Her multidisciplinary practice spans video, sculpture, and installation, integrating computational methods like physical computing, generative processes, and 3D printing. Treating technology as a subject of ontological inquiry, Shin critically investigates how technological infrastructures reconfigure human labor, affect, and value systems. Her research-driven practice playfully disassembles and grafts digital and nondigital processes to challenge underlying social hierarchies and reveal the hidden mechanics of our digital milieu. Most recently, she has been exploring critical narratives surrounding digital labor through generative sculpture and algorithm-driven practices.

    As an artist-researcher, Shin’s creative projects and academic inquiries have been widely introduced across international cultural and academic platforms. Her major solo exhibitions include The Unmined (Current Plans, Hong Kong, 2025), Smiley Suicide (Night Gallery, Los Angeles, 2015), and Hexagonal Chamber (Gallery Kong, Seoul, 2013), earning reviews from major publications such as The Los Angeles Times and Monthly Art. Her works have also been featured in prominent institutions and events, including the Gangwon International Triennale, the Incheon Women Artists’ Biennale, the Ilmin Museum of Art, and the Seoul Museum of Art in Korea; the Doosan Gallery, the Chelsea Art Museum, and the Fisher Landau Center for Art in New York; and Videoformes in France. Complementing her artistic practice, her research in digital art has been published in leading international journals such as Leonardo and presented at major international conferences, including ISEA. Shin holds a BFA from Seoul National University, an MFA from Columbia University, and a Ph.D. from the City University of Hong Kong. She is currently an Assistant Professor at the Academy of Visual Arts, Hong Kong Baptist University.

    Pit, 2025, Single-channel video, AI-generated voiceover, 8 min, © Gyung Jin SHIN, Courtesy of the artist

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    My journey as an artist started with a very simple moment. When I was about five years old, I was lying on the floor drawing. My grandmother praised my work, and right then, I simply thought: “I want to be an artist.” That dream has never changed. However, as I grew older, my interest naturally shifted from drawing on flat surfaces to making physical, three-dimensional objects. I was especially fascinated by movement and mechanics. I spent my childhood tinkering with small motors and batteries to build moving figures and miniature elevators. I even carried a small notebook everywhere, constantly sketching out ideas for little inventions.

    The turning point toward sculpture came during my time at an arts high school. In my very first sculpture class, we were asked to observe an animal and model it in clay. I chose a water buffalo. As my hands shaped the complex, twisting curves of its horns, I felt a sense of space and volume awaken inside me. That experience solidified my decision to major in sculpture. For me, the greatest appeal of this medium is the freedom it offers—being able to bring my imagination to life in physical space using a wide variety of materials.

    Smiley Suicide, 2009/2015, Performance video, kinetic sculpture, mixed media installation, Installation view at Night Gallery, Dimensions variable, © Gyung Jin SHIN, Courtesy of the artist and Night Gallery

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    In my practice, technology itself becomes a subject of deep contemplation, rather than just a tool or material to create an artwork. Throughout history, technology has never existed separately from our lives; instead, it has constantly co-evolved with us. Today, this rapid technological change is redefining what it means to be human.

    My main approach to exploring these themes is system-building. I create new systems by weaving together scientific principles, philosophical ideas, and historical events, surrounding  technology and its inherent technicity. Through these systems, my goal is to bring attention to the important questions and hidden structures that are often overlooked in our everyday lives and society.

    As technology fundamentally reshapes our reality at an unprecedented pace, navigating this shift requires more than just adapting to new tools. I firmly believe that contemporary art has a unique and essential role to play here. It calls for an artistic intervention—one that embraces imaginative leaps, unexpected twists, and a sense of humor. Art provides a crucial space to challenge the rigid logic of technological progress, reveal the hidden implications we might have missed, and ultimately spark meaningful conversations about the possible futures we actually want to create.

    Mimicking Venus, 2012, Single-channel video, sculptural installation, Installation view at the Ilmin Museum of Art, Dimensions variable, © Gyung Jin SHIN, Courtesy of the artist and the Ilmin Museum of Art

    How has your artistic style evolved over time?

    My artistic practice has evolved through a few key turning points. My early experiments with kinetic art marked the first major shift. Driven by a desire to create moving sculptures, I began combining water pumps with figurative forms and adding motorized elements to wooden structures. I was deeply fascinated by the mechanics of building a functional system. At the time, before platforms like Arduino or Python were widely accessible, and without formal technical training in my undergraduate and graduate studies, I frequented local electronics markets for advice. I even joined a university robotics club, teaching myself C programming, physical computing, and circuit design to bring my early kinetic installations to life.

    This period established the core logic of my work: bringing together different components and concepts to build a new system. Because how things work is just as important to me as the final object, I naturally started using performance and video to make these inner workings and processes visible. My experiments with materials expanded significantly during my MFA at Columbia University. There, I began mixing different disciplines to examine the underlying motivations of my practice. A prime example is Smiley Suicide (Fig. 01). Combining performance, video, and installation, this piece involves self-inflicted shots using a device made from a toy gun and a whipped cream dispenser. In this work, my own body and psychological state become essential parts of the newly constructed system.

    More recently, I have adopted “reverse engineering” as my main approach. I playfully dismantle, repurpose, and graft digital or non-digital processes to give them new meanings. Through this, I question the values and hierarchies hidden within specific historical and cultural contexts. For instance, in Mimicking Venus (Fig. 02), I modified an 18th-century pointing machine—a tool traditionally used by Neoclassical sculptors—to present a performance, sculpture, and video that breaks down classical iconography. Similarly, in Gray Hive (Fig. 03), which addresses the social phenomenon of “forced leisure” among solitary elderly individuals, I developed a narrative through video and installation that weaves together the ecology of bees with the daily routines of these seniors. 

    Gray Hive, 2013, Single-channel video, 5 min, © Gyung Jin SHIN, Courtesy of the artist

    Are there any particular mediums you prefer working with? Why?

    My work spans a wide range of forms and mediums, from performance, video, and sculpture to digital processes like physical computing, generative systems, and 3D printing. Rather than tying myself to a single medium, I freely choose the materials and technologies that best fit the ideas behind each project.

    When I use technology, my goal is never “automation” or “efficiency.” Instead, I focus on revealing the hidden, black-boxed processes that modern technology usually covers up. Because of this, my work intentionally avoids the sleek, seamless finish. I prefer to leave the mechanical principles and raw processes visible. For example, in my current exhibition, I created a wallpaper that visualizes raw data gathered from a data mining process (Fig. 04). My aim is to create a small crack in these rigidly structured technological systems—a space where artistic imagination and intervention can step in.

    Even though I deal with complex technologies and build invisible systems, I still consider myself a “sculptor” at heart. The physical labor of working with materials and space brings me a deep sense of joy. I am especially drawn to the traditional sculptural technique of casting—creating a master mold to produce multiple copies. The idea that endless variations can come from a single mold or kernel is fascinating to me, whether I look at it philosophically, technologically, or aesthetically. This approach has shaped my previous works and continues to evolve in my latest algorithm-based projects and generative sculptures (Fig. 05).

    At the same time, video remains a crucial medium for me. It allows me to share the internal logic and working processes of these systems with the audience. Lately, I have also been exploring the possibilities of 3D animation. For my solo exhibition, I collaborated with a VFX specialist to push my visual experiments even further (Fig. 06). Ultimately, video and 3D animation allow me to break free from the physical limits of time and space that traditional sculpture has, adding an entirely new layer of storytelling to my work.

    Mined Minds, 2025, Digital print on paper, data visualization, Dimensions variable, © Gyung Jin SHIN, Courtesy of the artist

    Do you collaborate with other artists or creators? If so, how has collaboration influenced your work?

    In the past, when creating my kinetic installations, I mostly collaborated with engineers. Back then, collaboration simply meant getting technical advice and help with programming or building moving parts. I didn’t want to lose control over the core ideas or the final visual outcome, so I never fully outsourced the work. I intentionally kept the technical scope within boundaries I could handle, ensuring I could modify and control the machines myself later. It was a natural boundary I set to maintain my independence as an artist.

    However, working with designers for my recent solo exhibition made me completely rethink what collaboration means. As we tackled specialized areas like data visualization and procedural modeling, my collaborators contributed not just their technical skills, but also their own aesthetic choices deeply into the work. Often, this led to results that neither of us could have predicted. It was a pleasant surprise and a major turning point that made me seriously reflect on the idea of shared, collective authorship in art.

    Building on this experience, I want to foster more equal and open-ended collaborations in the future. My next project, which I am currently planning, will rely much more heavily on programming. I am excited to see how exploring new ways of collaborating with experts will become a core driving force behind my upcoming work.

    Specimens, 2012-2019, Resin cast, generative sculptures, Dimensions variable, © Gyung Jin SHIN, Courtesy of the artist

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the future?

    Lately, I have been focusing on the theme of “digital labor,” critically exploring how technological infrastructure reshapes human labor and emotions. For instance, in my recent solo exhibition, The Unmined, I looked at how human cognitive labor and attention are mined and consumed as resources in the digital milieu (Fig. 07). This project will be shown to the public again next January at Hyundai Motorstudio Beijing. It will be part of the Hyundai Blue Prize-winning exhibition Ghosts of Extraction, featured alongside works by international media artists. Building on this momentum, I am also taking my algorithm-based generative sculptures to the next level.

    What I am particularly interested in is using data-driven and algorithm-based art to make the hidden sides of invisible systems visible, and to explore reflective, alternative possibilities. Data and algorithms—the core materials of modern technology—are never neutral; they hide complex power dynamics beneath the surface. As a creator who relies on this massive technological infrastructure, I know I cannot completely step outside the system. Because of this, I believe my role as a contemporary media artist is to work from within it. I want to ask ethical questions that are often overshadowed by technological hype, creating small cracks in dominant narratives to reveal what lies beneath. Moving forward, I plan to continue developing media art projects that explore and question how invisible technological forces reshape the forms of labor, affects, and value systems.

    Text and photo courtesy of Gyung Jin SHIN

    Website: https://www.gyungjinshin.com
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/gjshin_art


  • Interview | Seoul-Based Artist Sonahn lee

    Interview | Seoul-Based Artist Sonahn lee

    Sonahn Lee (b.1996) explores, through painting, the differences in perception shaped by individual ways of seeing and the uncertain sensations that arise from them. She treats scenes recorded on digital screens—such as photographs, films, and internet images—as evidence, translating them into painting through the layers of her own gaze and memory. In this process, forms gradually blur, are partially omitted, or overlap as a result of distortion and forgetting. The resulting surface is not a clear representation, but another scene formed through the overlap of material layers and the act of seeing. These painterly scenes reveal how each viewer perceives differently, while probing the point at which what ultimately escapes capture opens onto other possibilities.

    One second of Kairos, 2025, Oil on canvas, 163 x 224 cm

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    Rather than simply reproducing images, I have been more interested in the way a scene is perceived and translated into painting. I tend to stay with the question of how a scene is remembered and gradually changes over time. I repeatedly collect and observe fragments such as other people’s words, expressions, atmospheres, web images, and scenes from films. There are moments when scenes I actually witnessed overlap with intentionally edited images. I am especially drawn to blurred or failed photographs, and to moments that resist being fixed clearly. When translated into painting, differences inevitably emerge from the original image, and my work continues from the gaps created through that distance.

    Fleeting Worlds, 2025, Oil on canvas, 163 x 97 cm

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    My work revolves around the relationship between gaze, memory, and recorded images. I consider digital images as a form of evidence. Memories recalled through those images are continuously transformed and reconstructed. In that process, scenes that were
    previously unnoticed begin to emerge, generating different ways of seeing. I am interested in scenes that cannot be fixed into a single interpretation.

    Uncanny Family, 2025, Oil on canvas, 41 x 24 cm

    What interests you about moments when perception feels uncertain or unstable?

    I once made paintings based on side and rear-view mirrors. The more persistently I tried to observe the subject beyond the mirror, the more difficult it became to grasp clearly. Unnecessary surrounding information is recognized immediately, while the actual subject I try
    to focus on remains ambiguous. Driving at night reveals this condition more distinctly. While looking ahead, I simultaneously have to check the side and rear-view mirrors, constantly controlling multiple directions of attention at once. In strongly contrasted nighttime
    environments, it becomes difficult to accurately recognize the state of the subject, and those unrecognizable moments tend to attract my gaze even more. Rather than focusing on a single subject, I am interested in conditions where multiple gazes operate simultaneously. I continue trying to hold onto scenes that cannot be easily understood.

    Focus Shift, 2025, Oil on canvas, 41 x 24 cm

    What is your creative process like? Do you follow a routine or work spontaneously?

    In the process of looking through recorded images, I select repetitive compositions and scenes that feel strangely familiar. These images function as evidence, evoking memories while overlapping with other scenes. I work without deciding on a fixed conclusion in advance, continuously observing the differences between images and painting. Digital images deliver information immediately, whereas painting delays that information and creates layers. In this process, certain elements disappear while others remain emphasized, eventually becoming another scene altogether. Even the same color behaves differently depending on the physical condition of the surface, so I adjust the painting continuously as I work.

    A distant gaze, 2025, Oil on muslin, 53 x 42 cm

    How do your personal experiences and identity influence your art?

    My work begins from personal emotions, though I try to observe outwardly visible scenes in a restrained and detached way. Emotional distance within close relationships forms an important foundation for the work. On the surface, this appears less as direct emotion and more as intervals, gaps, and distance within the image. Although the work originates from my own gaze, I intentionally maintain distance, because even the same scene is perceived differently by each person depending on time and perspective. I paint not to complete a scene, but to preserve the distance that exists within it.

    Erased and Layered Into Being, 2025, Oil on canvas, 53 x 33 cm

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the
    future?

    Recently, I have been working on scenes from wedding ceremonies. Within the ritual itself, scenes are repeated in almost identical ways. They appear as perfect images, yet beneath them exist anxiety and confusion at the same time. Expressions and atmospheres never completely align. From the perspective of a viewer, these fleeting moments quickly disappear from memory, only to be recalled again through other wedding scenes. Elements such as dresses, veils, and rings seem less like expressions of individuality and more like devices that conceal it. From a distance, the image appears unified, but up close, incompatible elements overlap with one another. I divide these scenes into large and small canvases, constructing fragmented landscapes and images with a sense of distance, continuing to build surfaces where emotional unevenness remains visible.

    Text and photo courtesy of Sonahn Lee

    Website: https://pipegallery.com/artists/sonahn-lee
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sonahnlee/


  • Interview | Seoul-Based Artist Han Uido

    Interview | Seoul-Based Artist Han Uido

    Han Uido (b. 2003) is an artist based in Seoul, South Korea. She majored in East Asian painting at Sookmyung Women’s University. Her work juxtaposes distorted human figures with everyday settings to create surreal, allegorical scenes. Through this, she explores unstable identities and self-fragmentation shaped by social and psychological environments, while suggesting the fluid nature of the self—constantly deconstructed and reconfigured in contemporary society.

    She has held three solo exhibitions at Alparound (Seoul, 2023), E-Land Space (Seoul, 2024), and Hori Art Space (Seoul, 2025). She has also participated in numerous group and curated exhibitions, including at Artside Gallery (Seoul, 2026), Gyeomjae Jeongseon Art Museum (Seoul, 2025), Artwork Paris Seoul Gallery (Seoul, 2025), and Moon Gallery at Moonshin Art Museum (Seoul, 2024).

    Her accolades include the Breeze Prize (2024), selection as an emerging artist for the 14th E- Land Cultural Foundation Program (2024), and the Excellence Award at the 16th Gyeomjae Tomorrow’s Artist Award (2025). Her works are held in collections such as the Gyeonggi Cultural Foundation, Gyeomjae Jeongseon Art Museum, Breeze Art Fair, and E-Land Gallery, as well as in private collections.

    Backup, 2026, Oil on canvas, 193.9 x 130.3 cm

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I started my practice while working as an instructor at a children’s art academy. Being surrounded by their drawings had a strong impact on me—images with mixed facial features, three-fingered hands, and uneven bodies that clearly moved away from conventional representation. Rather than seeing these as technical imperfections, I understood them as expressions of fundamentally different ways of perceiving the world. That experience led me to question the visual standards I had long taken for granted, and to recognize the role of my own preconceived notions. Since then, my work has been driven by a central question: what do we rely on when we perceive and interpret what we see?

    Since then, I have been exploring how perception is shaped and distorted by social conventions and visual norms. In today’s digital environment, fragmented information, distorted memories, and manipulated facts circulate continuously, destabilizing the way we perceive the world. Within this context, prejudice emerges as an instinctive response to incomplete information, yet it also fixes perception and reinforces distortion.

    My work focuses on visually deconstructing and reconstructing this mechanism of perception. To reveal the layered nature of how we see—shaped by emotion, memory, relationships, and social context—I move away from refined representation and instead use imbalanced and imperfect bodies. Through this, I aim to expose inner conflict, social tension, and the gap between the self and the other.

    Ultimately, the work visualizes a cycle in which perception, shaped by external information, becomes fixed as prejudice and is projected back onto its subject, intensifying distortion. Through these cognitive fractures, I seek to reveal the contradictions of contemporary society and its unstable, fragmented identities.

    ID, 2026, Oil on canvas, 72.7 x 60.6 cm

    What is your creative process like? Do you follow a routine or work spontaneously?

    My work does not aim to reproduce a specific image; rather, it focuses on visually deconstructing and reconstructing the process through which perception is formed. I begin with scenes, emotions, memories, or social contexts drawn from everyday life, and build forms through repetition, layering, removal, and transformation.
    While some works start from drawings, most develop in an intuitive and spontaneous way, allowing forms to shift fluidly throughout the process. As a result, there is often a gap between the initial image I envision and the final outcome, and I consider this unpredictability to be an essential part of my practice.

    Massager, 2026, Oil on canvas, 130.3 x 97 cm

    Your practice engages with allegorical imagery. How do these symbolic elements begin to take shape in your work?

    The distorted and overlapping bodies within the image function as a portrait of contemporary individuals shaped by unstable structures of perception. These forms move away from refined representation, instead revealing inner fragmentation and social tension, while their contrast with everyday backgrounds presents the figures in an increasingly isolated state. This contrast further emphasizes their sense of isolation. In this process, the boundaries between “self and other” and “individual and society” naturally emerge, and the image itself begins to function as an allegory.

    In particular, the realistically rendered “eye” is not merely a bodily organ, but operates as a projection of emotion and a reflection of identity. At the same time, it functions as a medium for recognizing both the self and the other, becoming a gaze that seeks truth within a distorted landscape.

    I draw from everyday experiences of prejudice and bias as a starting point, using them to reveal the structural contradictions of society and the ways in which individual roles and sensibilities are formed within it, through an ironic and subtly humorous approach. Rather than directly exposing the rigidity of contemporary perception, I aim to reveal its underlying truths by twisting familiar scenes of daily life. The grotesque forms that deviate from visual order disorient familiar perceptions, prompting viewers to question what they have taken for “truth.”

    Noise Canceling, 2026, Oil on canvas, 72.7 x 60.6 cm

    What kinds of references—visual, literary, or otherwise—inform your practice?

    My work is not confined to a specific genre; rather, it is shaped by a wide range of images produced and consumed within the digital environment. Alongside visual sources such as social media, news, advertising, and memes, personal memory, emotion, and everyday experience also play an important role.

    Titles, in particular, function as a key element that expands the understanding of the image. I often record striking words or poetic expressions encountered through reading and develop them into titles. I also refer to language dictionaries to revisit definitions or discover new meanings that emerge in different contexts. These fragments of language often combine with everyday situations, conversations, and contemporary expressions, becoming the starting point of my work.

    Review, 2026, Oil on canvas, 65.6 x 53 cm

    What challenges have you faced as an artist, and how have you overcome them?

    The main challenge I faced was the anxiety, self-doubt, and sense of mannerism that came from trying to keep up with the standards and pace shaped by the digital environment. Under the pressure to be “newer,” “faster,” and “more perfect,” my work gradually fell into repetitive patterns, and I found myself relying more on external expectations and responses than on my own emotions and experiences. In that process, I began to experience a sense of fragmentation within myself.

    This condition led to constant doubt about the value of my work and a tendency toward self- censorship, eventually developing into a dilemma where I started to see myself as an object rather than a subject.
    To move beyond this, I began to refocus on my own emotions and lived experiences. Instead of following external standards, I shifted toward starting from what I genuinely feel and perceive, learning to accept the process itself, even in its imperfections.

    Rather than trying to resolve or unify this fragmented sense of self, my approach became one of confronting and revealing it as it is. As a result, my work has evolved into an exploration of unstable identity within the digital age, and the personal sensibility that forms within it.

    Rock of Luck, 2026, Oil on canvas, 227.3 x 145.5 cm

    What do you hope people take away from your art when they experience it?

    My work explores how what we believe to be “truth” can be easily unsettled and distorted within a digital environment. By transforming familiar figures and everyday scenes into something unfamiliar, I invite viewers to reflect on what they are actually seeing, and to question why they have come to believe it in a certain way.

    Rather than delivering a fixed interpretation, the work aims to create a moment for viewers to reconsider their own perspectives and standards. In encountering these images, I hope they begin to question the perceptions they have long taken for granted, and to sense other possibilities beneath them.

    Ultimately, the work does not seek to provide answers, but to encourage an experience in which viewers generate their own questions.

    Text and photo courtesy of Han Uido

    Website: https://hanuido.creatorlink.net/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/u__at_/


  • Interview | Seoul-Based Artist Hyun Woo Lee

    Interview | Seoul-Based Artist Hyun Woo Lee

    Hyunwoo Lee is a Seoul – Based visual artist whose practice centers on sculpture exploring corporeality. His work visualizes processes of renewal achieved by the fragmentation and subsequent re-approval of the body.

    An art gallery showcasing a collection of modern sculptures displayed on reflective pedestals, featuring various abstract forms and materials in a spacious, well-lit environment.
    Parenthesis, G Gallery, 2023, Seoul, Korea

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    The starting point of my work was the constant questioning within myself and the need for a physical response to it. After experiencing a certain event, I went through a process where my existing self was dismantled and then re-approved. I entered the path of art to translate this invisible internal cycle—projecting the inside to the outside, retracting it, and re-approving it—into the visual and three-dimensional language of sculpture.

    An art gallery interior featuring two sculptures: a small, textured piece on a wall shelf to the left, and a taller, intricate abstract sculpture with elongated elements in the center.
    Goldberg, WWNN gallery, Seoul, Korea

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    My core theme is ‘Self-Renewal.’ This is a cyclical process of denying a fixed ego, continuously dismantling the self through events, and then re-approving it. Rather than being finished products, my sculptures are physical records that capture the very act of questioning—constantly tearing myself down and rebuilding.

    A large sculptural object resembling an oval, textured stone with a patterned surface, supported by elongated, abstract legs in a light color, placed against a white wall with a concrete floor.
    Carapaciorum Membrana, 2023, Mixed media, 45 x 45 x 100 cm

    In your work, how does the transformation of materials into sculptural form create meaning or evoke perception?

    I fragment the human form and combine it with heterogeneous masses of metal. In this process, the body loses its special status and is treated as a material with the same horizontal value as the metal. This declarative act of ‘re-approving’ an object from a completely different dimension as part of the body causes a kind of ‘material betrayal.’ As viewers witness the familiar body tangling with and being deformed by alien metal, they experience their existing cognitive frameworks being shaken.

    A sculptural piece resembling twisted organic forms on a white pedestal against a neutral background.
    Bonny, 2025 Mixed media, 210 x 25 x 35 cm

    What do you hope people take away from your art when they experience it?

    Rather than reading a specific text or message from the work, I hope viewers fully confront the unfamiliar sense of affect triggered by this ‘material betrayal.’ Through the sight of the supposedly solid boundaries of the body and self collapsing and fusing with other materials, I hope viewers can take away a sensory starting point to bring out their own interiors, look at them in an unfamiliar way, and renew themselves.

    A sculpture combining a rabbit's body with four metallic legs, creating a surreal and artistic piece.
    Untitled, 2020, Elk leather, Aluminum casting , 75 x 30 x 85 cm

    What challenges have you faced as an artist, and how have you overcome them?

    My greatest challenge is that my sensory receptors have become extremely sensitive as I repeatedly delve deep into my inner self, confront it, and then embrace it again. Absorbing countless external environments and information from daily life without any filter causes significant physical and mental fatigue. However, I do not see this as something I must forcibly ‘overcome.’ Instead, I am learning to adapt to this heightened sensitivity and willingly endure the accompanying discomfort. I believe this period of endurance—accepting the state of sensory overload rather than trying to control it—is another form of ‘self-renewal’ that ultimately matures me as a human being.

    A contemporary art installation featuring a central sculpture with elongated, abstract forms hanging on the walls, illuminated by soft lighting in a minimalist gallery space.
    Acardius, DIESEL gallery, Tokyo, Japan

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the future?

    I am currently conceptualizing two main directions for my sculpture. The first is a work taking the form of a ‘toilet.’ I once happened to see an outdoor sculpture that had oxidized into a blue hue from accumulated bird droppings; I drew deep formal inspiration from the way traces of the external environment alter a material’s surface. The second direction deepens the concepts I have been continuously exploring: using the idea of ‘prosthetics’ to ‘re-approve’ a dismantled body as a new physical entity. I plan to embody this process of fragmentation and integration in the language of sculpture, exploring how a lost body part is incorporated back into oneself.

    Text & photo courtesy of Hyun Woo Lee

    Artist standing next to a modern sculpture featuring metallic and organic elements, showcasing a textured centerpiece resembling natural materials.

    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/pip_archive_/


  • Interview | New York-based Artist Cathleen Luo

    Interview | New York-based Artist Cathleen Luo

    Cathleen Luo (they) is an artist and art educator based in New York, working primarily in ceramics and installation. They received a B.A. in Visual Arts from Columbia University and currently work as a museum educator at The Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Studio Museum in Harlem. Luo’s practice integrates their pedagogy of radical care with sculptural processes, centering connection, touch, and modern spirituality through participatory encounters with meditative ceramic figures.

    Their work has been exhibited in group exhibitions at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C., Field Projects in New York City, and the Every Woman Biennial at Pen + Brush Gallery in New York. In 2024,  Luo was awarded the Asian American Arts Alliance’s What Can We Do Grant to lead community-based arts programming in Manhattan’s Chinatown during Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month. Additional support includes The Color Network Studio Grant, the SICK Magazine Grant for Disabled Sculptors, and CERF+’s Get Ready Grant.

    In 2025, Luo was selected to participate in the inaugural Powerhouse Arts’ Artist Subsidy Program, producing large-scale ceramic works with the support of a fabrication team.

    Guardian Lions, 2025

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I was always making art and writing growing up, but I expected to study science in college. I’ve always loved science for its methodical way of understanding the world, but over time I realized it wasn’t asking all the questions I cared about and often cut out variables it couldn’t understand, often the most human ones. It often searched for an approximate right answer, while I was becoming more interested in ambiguity, spirituality, and the emotional realities of being human.

    The pandemic became a turning point. Like many people, I was forced to ask myself what mattered most, and I realized I wanted to use art as a way of investigating lived and spiritual experience. I ended up declaring my majors as Visual Arts and Creative Writing late into college, while filling my electives with philosophy, religion, literature, and social theory. What I appreciated most wasn’t just the subject matter, but that those disciplines gave me permission to slow down. 

    I found museum education through teaching in schools in Harlem and the Bronx, where I saw firsthand how arts education is often the first thing to disappear from under-resourced schools. That experience led me into community programming and eventually accessibility work in museums, where I also began reckoning with my own disability. Today, my work as a museum educator is inseparable from my work as an artist. I don’t really distinguish between the two. Both are ways of helping people look more closely, ask deeper questions, and build empathy through shared experiences.

    Altar Piece 1 (installation), 2024, Glazed ceramic, incense, candles, oranges, apples, red suede, cushions, porcelain bowls, cigarettes, US dollar bills, flowers, 5 x 2.5 x 2 ft

    How do you stay inspired and motivated to create new work?

    For many people, starting a new project feels like labor, but for me it’s compulsive. My mind constantly dreams and analyzes, and ponderings become manifestations of whatever I’m meditating on: envy, nonchalance, tenderness, protection, or a particular pose, gesture, or mannerism I want to capture.

    These gestures often begin with things I see around me: a hand half raised, a slight turn of the head, or an exaggerated pose. A quick and snappy moment quickly transforms into an idea to be sat on and thought about, memorialized in the stillness of sculpture. So much can be conveyed in one slight movement. There are so many of these frozen moments living in my head that I don’t think I’ll ever run out of figures to make.

    I don’t actively look for inspiration. It’s only in retrospect that I recognize why I’ve become obsessed with a certain gesture, object, or feeling, and what thread connects one body of work to the next. I often supplement my ideas with reading, mostly surrealist fiction or histories of Buddhism or Asia.

    While I’m increasingly incorporating historical research as my work reflects on my family’s migration to America, my ideas rarely begin with books or archives. They begin with half-memories, observations, offhand comments, and passing thoughts that linger until they demand a physical form.

    My motivation to make comes from an almost irresistible need to materialize my thoughts. I hope that when people encounter my work, they recognize something of themselves in it. My sculptures are my mirrors and of those like me, validating a specific way of moving through and experiencing the world.

    Chain Lamp, Agnes and Cathleen with braids, 2025

    Your practice focuses on ceramics and installation. What first drew you to these mediums?

    I actually came to ceramics by accident. I needed to fulfill a requirement during my last year of college, and up until then I had been primarily a figurative painter. As someone with low vision, I was drawn to color, smooth surfaces, and crisp forms with saturated gradients, but I always struggled to finish paintings the way I envisioned, unable to clean up the small details. Looking back, ceramics feels obvious in its tactile quality. People had long described my paintings as sculptural, and to have finally found a medium that allows me to prioritize touch rather than sight.

    The move toward installation happened just as naturally. I never liked the idea of my sculptures sitting on white pedestals. They are deities, companions, and beloved objects that deserve beautiful places to live. They are meant to hold space for reflection, so I wanted to create environments where people could spend time with them rather than simply observe them.

    The word “installation” almost feels too formal for what I’m trying to do. I’m really interested in creating spaces that feel welcoming and human, through altar-like displays, seating, textiles, and other domestic elements that invite people to gather. As a community organizer and museum educator, I think a lot about how art can facilitate encounters between people. Projects like Dinner Party as Revolution, where visitors shared a meal around my sculptures, are examples of the kinds of contemporary rituals I want to create, spaces where people can reflect, connect, and experience a sense of belonging in an era defined by social alienation.

    My work as a museum educator has deeply influenced this approach. Some of my favorite programs to lead are accessible touch tours for blind and low vision visitors at the Metropolitan Museum of Art through their Access Programs, and I spend a great deal of time thinking about how sacred and everyday objects enter museums and become separated from the communities that originally used them. Once behind glass or placed on pedestals, they can become distant or exoticized, rather than remaining part of lived ritual.

    That has made me think carefully about the kinds of objects I want to make. I want my sculptures to return to people. They are not meant to be above us, but to be versions of us. Touch, conversation, and gathering are central to the work because I believe art belongs in daily life. As traditional forms of spirituality continue to shift, I’m interested in creating spaces that offer another kind of spiritual home—places where people can feel safe, cared for, and connected to one another.

    Guardian Lions, 2025

    How do you balance control and unpredictability when working with clay?

    I think people often describe ceramics as a constant battle with the material—that the clay dries too fast, slumps, cracks, or in worst case scenario, explodes in the kiln. I’ve never really related to that mindset. My expectations and I are good friends.

    I’m a deeply imperfect person, and many would describe me as messy. My work reflects that. Rather than trying to force clay into perfection, I’ve learned to let it carry evidence of the life it has lived, and reflecting the hands of the person who collaborated with the material. The sculptures I admire most in museums feel wise because they bear the marks of time, repair, and survival. Though my works’ history is much shorter, it still feels like an honest reflection of the process and myself as an artist.

    Working at the Metropolitan Museum of Art has also changed the way I think about making. Spending time with conservators and seeing how objects are cared for over centuries has made me realize that breakage isn’t the end of a sculpture.As my practice expands beyond ceramics into sculpture more broadly, I’ve come to enjoy repair as a creative process in itself, using epoxies, resins, and reconstruction to push a material beyond its limits.

    I don’t expect myself to make pristine, production-potter ceramics. My hand is visible in the work, and my hands are always a little messy. I let my pieces do what they need to do, which sometimes means slipping out of my hands.

    Guardian Lions, 2025

    What do you hope people take away from your art when they experience it?

    I want people to think. Not necessarily in the way I think, but to begin to be changed in observing their own reactions. I often think of the word Recognition and the Law of recognition and the experience of seeing yourself in something or someone else. It is a powerful feeling, especially in a society defined by and split by difference. 

    To learn is not always to absorb new information but to realize something has always been there. For some people, recognition comes easily. Others may initially be unsettled by the strangeness of the bodies or their unconventional beauty. I hope that discomfort becomes an invitation rather than a barrier—an opportunity to question why certain forms feel unfamiliar and what our ideas of beauty, humanity, or spirituality are rooted in.

    Others will feel shocked by their strangeness, and I hope they interrogate that discomfort. I hope my pieces push people to reflect on the concepts my sculptures represent. The discomfort is of being approached with alternative ideas of moving through the world is important. I hope that discomfort becomes an invitation rather than a barrier—an opportunity to question why certain forms feel unfamiliar and what our ideas of beauty, humanity, or spirituality are rooted in.

    Each sculpture begins as a meditation on a particular question or emotional state: humility, ecstasy, protection, grief. Their gestures are intentional. The way a shoulder slumps, a hand reaches, or a body folds into itself all become ways of thinking through those ideas without words. I hope people spend time with those gestures and allow themselves to wonder.

    Ultimately, though, my work isn’t just about the relationship between a person and my sculpture, it’s about the relationships that form them My work as a museum educator centers on using art as a rool to build empathy through shared observation and storytelling. I bring that same pedagogy into my installations, designing spaces that encourage conversation, touch, and communal reflection. If someone leaves not only seeing themselves a little more clearly, but also feeling more connected to the people experiencing the work beside them, then I feel the sculpture has done its job.

    Ecstasy Devil, 2024, Ceramics

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the future?

    Right now I’m experimenting with atmospheric firings and building larger, more iterative bodies of work. I’m becoming less interested in making a single deity and more interested in creating entire pantheons—groups of figures that exist in relationship to one another.

    I’ve always joked that I was going to make larger sculptures, even though monumental scale can feel like such a stereotypically “man artist” ambition. But I’ve realized that what I’m actually after isn’t bigness for its own sake. I’m interested in what scale allows. A room full of deities creates an entirely different experience than a single figure. It begins to feel like a temple—a space dedicated to meditation, gathering, and reflection.

    Looking ahead, I want to continue expanding both the physical scale of my work and the social scale of it. I’m imagining installations that become places people return to, activated through communal meals, performances, touch, and other contemporary rituals. My hope is to keep building spaces where sculpture isn’t just something to look at, but something people live with, gather around, and find themselves reflected in.

    Text & photo courtesy of Cathleen Luo

    Website: https://cathleenluo.myportfolio.com
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/catluo27.art/


  • Interview | Beijing-Based Artist Liu Shiyuan

    Interview | Beijing-Based Artist Liu Shiyuan

    Liu Shiyuan sees herself as an image-maker and researcher. Through the deconstruction and recombination of online visual materials, popular cultural symbols, and narrative structures, she explores the mechanisms of image production, circulation, and perception in contemporary society. She is particularly interested in the re-editing and recontextualization of images in the digital age, as well as the ideologies, emotional structures, and cultural biases embedded within them. She is especially adept at working with discarded materials, using them to engage with the remnants of the information age. The images Liu Shiyuan creates—whether still or moving—are layered upon one another, at times continuous and at other times fragmented. What they evoke is less the uncanny dimension revealed through acts of appropriation by artists of the “Pictures Generation” than the formal and narrative potential reactivated from within the images themselves. Emerging through these different image assemblages is a concealed form of critical reflection.

    A frame of For The Photos I Didn’t Take, For The Stories I Didn’t Read , 2020, 4K video, single channel, color, stereo sound, 16 min 39 sec, Photographer Jan Søndergaard.

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I was born and raised in Beijing. When I was little, I couldn’t stop drawing. I think I was a very lucky kid because I found my interest so early. As an only child, I never felt lonely. I studied at the Central Academy of Fine Arts in Beijing, and later moved to New York to pursue my MFA at the School of Visual Arts. Since then, I have been living and working between Beijing and Copenhagen. When I was three years old, adults would ask me what I wanted to do in the future. I always said “painter” — I didn’t know the word “artist” yet. Then I just held onto that idea. I never really thought about doing anything else. It’s a good question — why become an artist? But I was so young that I honestly can’t remember the reason behind that decision. I guess I just really wanted to.

    Punished You And Me No.15, 2019-2025, Acrylic marker on watercolor paper, UV spray, 100 x 70 cm, Photographer Jan Søndergaard.

    Your practice often engages with a sense of fluid or unstable identity. How does this condition emerge within your practice?

    I think instability is simply the condition of contemporary life. Especially for people of my generation, who grew up during rapid modernization and digitalization, identity is no longer something fixed or singular. It is constantly shifting depending on geography, language, technology, memory, desire, and projection. Therefore, I sometimes doubt whether it still makes sense to talk about identity as a stable category at all. In my work, I’m interested in the space where rationality and absurdity coexist. Many of the materials and images I use feel familiar but slightly displaced — like something extracted from the internet, mass culture, or collective memory, and then emotionally reconfigured. The storytelling is often about how similar we are to one another, while at the same time how unique we are as individuals.

    Fuck it, I love you, 2018, Custom-printed felttiles, found furniture and lamps, fresh coffee, cups and coffee scent, Dimensions variable.

    What is your creative process like? Do you follow a routine or work spontaneously?

    It takes time for me to get into a working mood, but once I do, I’m very routine-oriented. On working days, I’m ready to be creative at 9 a.m. I constantly collect fragments — small notes, screenshots, lists of new films, pages from old magazines, color samples from construction supply stores, tiles washed up by the sea, postcards, and so on. Sometimes I don’t immediately understand why I’m attracted to something, but later different fragments begin to connect by themselves. A work can start from a very small visual detail or an absurd feeling that stays in my mind for months. But I’m never worried that these things won’t become projects, because this is what I do. I’ve trained myself to turn thoughts into artworks.

    Detail of This Way or That Way, 2016, Installation of 80 printed felt carpets, 100 x 100 cm each

    How do you think the experience of growing up within rapid technological and cultural change informs your work today?

    My generation in China experienced an extremely compressed transformation. Within a relatively short period of time, we moved from a more localized reality into an aggressively globalized and hyper-digital condition. Desire itself became increasingly shaped by images, algorithms, and global circulation. Artificiality is something I keep returning to — fake fruits, synthetic materials, staged emotions, reproduced images, digital aesthetics. But I don’t see artificiality as the opposite of truth. Sometimes the artificial reveals contemporary reality more honestly than something “authentic.”

    Installation It’s Nice to See You, 2017, Sewing and mixed media on polyester, 150 x 150 cm.
    Detail of It’s Nice to See You

    Having lived across different cultural contexts, how do these experiences shape the way you approach your work?

    It doesn’t shape anything. It has unshaped almost everything. Sometimes I even wonder how my son will feel about having a mother who doesn’t physically belong anywhere. I never really felt fully rooted, but I also don’t see that as a negative thing. The word “belonging” is somehow overvalued nowadays. We want artists to work on different topics so that we have enough names to fill all the categories. But this is one of the things I don’t do. So I guess this rejection has shaped my way of thinking more than my experience of different cultures. What has affected me appears more in daily life. When you move constantly between languages and systems, you begin to realize how relative many things are — taste, behavior, morality, aesthetics, even emotional expression. I’m slowly losing my language skills. My Chinese is getting worse, my English is not improving, and I’m not really using my Danish. But after all, I’m a visual artist. I have one language that belongs to me. I use it when I have conversations with my works.

    A screen of Love Poem, 2015, Video installation on five separate screens, HD 1728 x 1080 each

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the future?

    Lately, I’ve been thinking a lot about emotional perception in relation to contemporary image culture. It is not something new. The search for meaning in images — both still and moving — is something I expect to continue for the rest of my life. At the moment, I’m preparing my next solo exhibition, titled Beige. Beige used to be the most widely used color in Denmark. It was considered universally agreeable, but now it has become a symbol of stagnation — perhaps even the most hated color. Its refusal to take a position, its fear of offending, has turned neutrality into emptiness. Beige is not inclusive; it is evasive. It avoids conflict, but it also avoids meaning. Sometimes I can feel that change might be possible, but new ideas can easily slip away if we don’t act quickly enough.

    A frame of Lost In Export, 2015, Single channel video, color, sound, 4k, 3996 x 2160, 33 min 34 sec

    Text and photo courtesy of Liu Shiyuan

    Website: https://www.studioliushiyuan.dk/
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/studio_liu_shiyuan/


  • Interview | New York-based Artist Claudia Koh

    Interview | New York-based Artist Claudia Koh

    Claudia Koh (b. 1999, Singapore) is a painter whose practice explores the relationship between human experience, the built environment, and the ecosystems that emerge between them. Drawing inspiration from urban landscapes, domestic spaces, and cultivated environments, her work reflects on the ways individuals navigate structures that simultaneously nurture, organize, and constrain everyday life.

    Raised in Singapore, a young city shaped by careful planning and continual cultivation, Koh is interested in the tensions between nature and control, intimacy and regulation, and individuality and collective belonging. Through imagined environments that blend architecture, landscape, and domestic life, she examines themes of resilience, care, and coexistence.

    Bird’s Eye View, 2025, Oil on canvas, 91 x 120 cm

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey? 

    I loved visiting museums when I was younger and was fortunate to travel to a different country almost every year. I was especially fascinated by medieval paintings and the unsettling emotions they evoked. Outside of museums, I loved making hand drawn birthday cards and would find any excuse to celebrate something just so I could create one. 

    Windbreaker, 2025, Oil on canvas, 55 x 60 cm

    How do you stay inspired and motivated to create new work? 

    When I’m not painting, I do almost everything else. I love watching short films, writing reviews, and reading essays on film or whatever I’m curious about at the moment. Whenever I feel burnt out, I always go back to Soul—it’s a film that never fails to ground me. 

    Rainfall, 2026, Oil on canvas, 45 x 35 cm

    Many of your works seem to reflect the tension between constraint and adaptation. How do you translate this tension into painting or sculpture? 

    I think adaptation is one of the quietest forms of resistance. Rather than confronting constraints directly, my work asks how life reorganizes itself within it. I am interested in the ways people create meaning through small acts of care, routine, companionship, and imagination. Whether through architecture, cultivated landscapes, or relationships with plants and animals, these ecosystems become spaces where resilience is practiced rather than declared. My paintings are less about depicting limitation than revealing the unexpected forms of life that emerge because of it. 

    tiger, rabbit, mouse, 2025, Oil on canvas, 22 x 30 cm

    How do you choose your colours, compositions, materials? 

    Most of the time, I choose them subconsciously. I naturally gravitate toward colors inspired by Singapore’s urban landscape, where brightly painted apartment buildings exist alongside lush greenery. Even my choice of materials reflects that balance between the organic and the man made. 

    The Magician, 2026, Oil on canvas, 100 x 120 cm

    Has your practice changed over time ? If so, what has shifted the most?

     I used to believe I had to hold onto difficult emotions to keep making meaningful work, as if they were the only thing driving me forward. Over time, I’ve learned to approach both life and painting with more calm and balance. I’m much more at peace now, and I trust the work to become what it needs to be. Instead of trying to control every outcome, I let it exist without expectations, allowing it to grow in its own way and reveal what it has to teach me. 

    What projects are you working on? What can we expect in the future? 

    Many many more paintings. And more adventurous sculptures! 

    Text and photo courtesy of Claudia Koh

    Website: https://claudiakoh.com
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/claudiaakoh


  • Interview | Taipei-Based Artist Jam Wu

    Interview | Taipei-Based Artist Jam Wu

    Jam Wu, born in Tainan, Taiwan. Lives and works in Taipei, Taiwan. Jam Wu explores the relationship between imagery and medium. Employing elements such as paper cutting, video, and space, his artistic practice involves notions of culture and community through a profound participatory approach in local projects and publications. He dedicates his focus to the individual’s universal pursuit of the creative self, while emphasizing the uniqueness of each culture and individual. His spiritual motivation lies in his poetic and primitive yearnings. In his work, imagery, allegory, and concept manifest themselves not as aesthetic contemplation, but as spiritual comfort immersed in life.

    Notable solo exhibitions include: Shadow Puppeteer, TKG+, Taipei, Taiwan (2023).  Jam Wu: Through the Walls, TKG+ Projects, Taipei, Taiwan (2021); Whispers of Animism, Chishang Art Center, Taitung, Taiwan (2020). Group exhibitions include: Spectrosynthesis II, Bangkok Art and Culture Center, Bangkok, Thailand (2019); Fra due culture, Palazzo Arese Borromeo, Milan; Magazzini dell’Arte Contemporanea, Sicily, Italy (2018); Art and Design — Dialogue With Materials, Toyama Prefectural Museum of Art and Design, Toyama, Japan (2017); Fully Loaded Tainan–New York 2017, Pfizer Building, New York, U.S. (2017); Art as Social Interaction, 1a Space, Hong Kong; The Pier-2 Art Center, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (2014). He was a resident artist at Cité internationale des arts, Paris, France (2022); Watermill Center, Water Mill, New York, U.S. (2009).

    His works are housed in the collections of Facebook AIR Program, Hermès — Petit h Collection, Peninsula Paris, Deutsche Bank Center, Tainan Art Museum, and Kaohsiung Museum of Fine Arts.

    Bonfire — Weaving — 158, 2022, Paper, acrylic, 107.5 x 84 cm

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I was born in the subtropical south of Taiwan, where humidity, vegetation, folk rituals, and ancestral memory are deeply woven into everyday life.

    After graduating from the architecture department, I began working in spatial design for theater, especially in collaboration with dancers. Theater is always a collective act — a choreography of many bodies and minds. Yet when I returned to myself, paper cutting became the beginning of my personal dialogue with land and tradition.

    I have long been influenced by folk art and maternal culture, fascinated by raw and ancient symbols that carry a primitive sense of mystery. Through cutting, I began searching for a way to give form to the images that drifted within my mind. That gesture — simple yet irreversible — became the origin of my artistic language.

    Bonfire — Weaving — 186, 2026, Paper, plastic paper, mixed pigments, 29.5 x 33.5 cm

    What are the main themes or concepts you explore in your work?

    My work explores what remains universal in us as human beings: our relationship with nature, and how we confront the disappearance of history and memory.

    In the beginning, I did not confine myself to any fixed artistic form. Instead, I circled around the core questions I wished to approach, touching them indirectly, like tapping on the edges of a hidden structure. I was searching for different possibilities within traditions that often seem impossible to overturn.

    Paper cutting, especially, carries a particular weight. It is classified as an Intangible Cultural Heritage of humanity — an ancient tradition deeply rooted in collective memory. I became interested in how such a historical form could still breathe differently within contemporary art.

    Recently, I have been researching Taiwan as one of the origins of Austronesian culture, using weaving as another method to deconstruct paper cutting. I often dismantle old books, handwritten letters, or academic texts, transforming them into the material foundation of my works. Through cutting and weaving, personal memory intertwines with macro histories and cultural fragments, gradually forming primordial landscapes that speak about the origins of civilization itself.

    Wave Of Spring — 13, 2026, Paper, mixed pigments, embroidery, 64 x 85 cm

    Who or what are your biggest influences, both artistically and personally?

    Literature — especially poetry — has profoundly shaped me. Contemporary Chinese poetry, with its rhythm, pauses, and resonance, constantly influences my intuition and sensory perception.

    Cinema and music are also essential nourishment in my life. When I immerse myself in physical labor and repetitive handwork, music becomes something almost bodily — it stirs movement from within.

    I did not graduate from an art academy. Becoming a visual artist was never part of my original life plan. Even now, this path still feels unfamiliar to me in certain ways, as though I am continuously walking into unknown terrain.

    Solo exhibition — Shadow Puppeteer, 2023, Six-channel video installation, Dimensions variable, TKG+, Photo © Anpis Wang.

    How does working with different art mediums, such as paper cutting, installation and weaving, connect you with specific culture and community?

    Before entering university, I worked as a portrait photographer during the era of film photography. Later, studying architecture opened another perspective on how I understand space, structure, and human presence. Even now, I continue to participate in theater design. Looking back, my path has always been multidimensional.

    When I initiate participatory or community-based projects, I approach them through many different layers — literature, recipes, belief systems, the body, craftsmanship — excavating local memory and hidden histories through everyday traces.

    But when I return to my own personal practice, I seek something much simpler and more instinctive. I want to work with my hands in a direct and almost primitive way, thinking less, sensing more. For me, the most desired state of creation is deeply physical — quiet, intuitive, and bodily.

    Wave Of Spring, 2026, view on exhibition Cotton and Stone at New Taipei City Art Museum

    Can you describe a recent project or artwork that you are particularly proud of?

    Recently, I began developing a new series titled Wave Of Spring, first presented in the group exhibition Cotton and Stone at the New Taipei City Art Museum.

    In this series, I attempt to gather the flowing gestures and diluted stains of ink painting back into the silhouette of paper cutting. Liquid ink moves restlessly between painting and cut paper, creating a state of disturbance and transition between the two.

    Wave Of Spring and Bonfire — Weaving will be presented this year at Art Basel in Basel, Switzerland, as well as in the inaugural Tainan Biennial.

    What do you hope people take away from your art when they experience it?

    I hope viewers can intuitively sense a spatial dimension woven out of flatness itself — something quiet, yet filled with latent force.

    Within the dense layers of weaving and overlapping paper, I hope to evoke a sensory resonance connected to one’s own origins and landscapes of memory. History, to me, is never static. Through the artist’s hand, touch, and way of thinking, it continues to grow, shift, and flow.

    Text and photo courtesy of Jam Wu

    Website: www.jamwu.com
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jam.wu.jam/


  • Interview | New York-based Artist Tiantian Lou

    Interview | New York-based Artist Tiantian Lou

    Tiantian Lou (b. 1995) is an artist who lives and works in Brooklyn, New York. She graduated with architecture degrees from Princeton University and the Rhode Island School of Design. With experience in textile and printmaking, Tiantian operates a range of artistic media and utilizes them in experimental ways. Her works has been shown internationally, including Radius Gallery, Hangzhou (2026); Centre of Contemporary Art, Vancouver (2025); Volta Art Fair, Basel (2025); Shu Museum, Beijing (2025); Untitled Art Fair, Miami (2024); Soloway Gallery, Brooklyn (2024); Two Palms Press, New York (2023); LATITUDE Gallery, New York (2022); Milan Design Week, Italy (2022); Chashama Gallery, Brooklyn (2019).

    Homeseeking, 2025, Oil on linen, 28 x 40 in

    Can you tell us about your background and how you started your artistic journey?

    I was an architecture student for seven years,and while I was drawn to the intellectual side of the discipline, I found myself especially excited by making things with my hands, working with color, and thinking through ideas visually. Over time, I became increasingly interested in the freedom that art offered—the ability to follow intuition, ambiguity, and personal curiosity. After graduate school, I was fortunate to work at a place with an amazing creative community. In many ways, my artistic journey has been shaped by both worlds. Architecture gave me a foundation in structure and form, while my experiences in the art community encouraged me to embrace experimentation and having my own voice.

    Here One Moment, 2026, Oil on linen, 36 x 36 in

    How do you stay inspired and motivated to create new work?

    My art is deeply intertwined with my daily life. I draw from lots of elements from my day to day experience –fragments of text I’ve read or fleeting moments I’ve captured—and let them gradually feed into my work.  I find inspiration in overlooked architectural elements in ordinary spaces,  like building edges, pipes, handrails, or hinges. These details often become starting points for thinking about my assemblies. Beyond these external influences, I really enjoy the process of making itself. My favorite moments are when I can fully immerse myself in the work while listening to an audiobook—it creates a kind of rhythm where thinking and making happen at the same time.

    Correspondent, 2026, Oil on linen, 44 x 40 in

    Your practice often questions ideas of structure, softness, and material stability. How do these ideas shape your creative process?

    I’m drawn to moments when something feels slightly off—when a structure begins to loosen differently than expected. I think that’s where my interest in softness comes from. I’m fascinated by forms that are supposed to communicate stability and permanence, and I like seeing what happens when those assumptions start to break down. 

    In the studio, this often means taking familiar architectural forms—columns, pipes, arches—and pushing them away from their intended function. I make them soft, allow them to sag, or shift. I’m interested in the tension that emerges when a form is still recognizable but no longer behaves the way it’s supposed to. 

    That idea also influences how I build paintings and sculptures. I rarely aim for a perfectly resolved composition. Instead, I’m looking for a state of adjustment, where things feel balanced but only temporarily. I spend a lot of time responding to small shifts in form, color, material, and scale, letting the work evolve through those decisions.

    Ultimately, I’m less interested in architecture itself than in what these structures can stand in for. They become a way for me to think about how people navigate uncertainty, how systems change over time, and how something new can emerge when familiar forms begin to loosen.

    Supersonic-Wonderland, 2026, Oil on linen, 11 x 14 in

    Can you describe a recent project or artwork that you are particularly proud of?

    This Spring, I realized my first solo project at Radius Gallery in Hangzhou. I’m really grateful for the entire experience, and very inspired by all the people that I met there. The process allowed me to bring together many ideas that I had been developing over the past few years. 

    I tend to think about exhibitions on two scales. On one hand, I see the gallery as a single installation, where individual works become elements within a larger environment. I’m interested in how viewers move through the space and how different pieces relate to one another. On the other hand, each artwork also needs to function as a complete thought on its own. I spent hundreds of hours in the studio developing the paintings and sculptures, allowing them to evolve through making and experimentation.

    The exhibition helped me connect ideas that had previously existed as separate investigations. It also taught me a tremendous amount about realizing a solo exhibition—from the initial conversations and planning stages to installation and presentation. 

    SoftDuct-Transiton-#005, 2026, Acrylic on sewn linen, 72 x 60 x 15 in

    What do you hope people take away from your art when they experience it?

    I hope people have an intimate experience with the work and find something that resonates with them personally. A lot of my work explores uncertainty, both spatially and materially. In the paintings, I build environments that can be read in multiple ways through shifts in light, color, and form. In the sculptures, I use soft, pliable materials to challenge expectations about structures that are usually perceived as rigid and stable. Through the works, I hope to create a moment of pause—a space where people can question and form their own connections.

    Here One Moment, 2026, Radius Gallery, Hangzhou, Install shot 02

    What projects are you currently working on, and what can we expect from you in the future?

    This summer, I’m giving myself time to experiment and reflect on everything I learned while preparing my solo exhibition over the past year. The process of making that show clarified a lot of ideas for me, but it also opened up new questions that I’m excited to explore.

    Right now, I’m focused primarily on my paintings, testing new compositions, forms, and spatial relationships. I’m trying to be more open-ended in the studio and allow myself room for exploration rather than working toward a specific outcome. My goal is to develop a new body of work that builds on these investigations and expands the conversation between my paintings and sculptures. I’m excited to continue pushing ideas around structure, softness, and instability, and I look forward to sharing this new work in New York next year.

    Text and photo courtesy of Tiantian Lou

    Website: https://loutiantian.com
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tiantianll/